Log in is not required to search. In the red banner above select: I Want To > Search > Permits

Code Enforcement Detail

Code Enforcement Detail
Case Number	CE22040098	complainant
Case Date	04-12-2022	address
Origination	PHONE - TELEPHONE CALL RECEIVED	Status	C - CLOSED
Operator	gclogsto	Officer	NORTH
Fines Balance	$0.00
Lien Balance	$0.00
Total Balance	$0.00
Property On Case
STRAP NBR	C-08-35-31-031-0090-0020	Owner	REED SHELL
Unit		Owner Address	336 ARBUCKLE CREEK RD
Property Address	336 ARBUCKLE CREEK RD	City/State/Zip	LORIDA FL 33857
City/State/Zip	LORIDA FL 33857	Phone

Case Description

04/12/2022 UPSET CALLER STATED HE WAS RECORDING ME

BEFORE MAKING COMPLAINT THAT HE HAS HAD TO OPEN A

NEW COMPLAINT ABOUT THIS PROPERTY EVERY YEAR FOR

THE LAST 5-7 YEARS (THERE IS ONLY ONE PREVIOUS

COMPLAINT IN THE SYSTEM) FOR CHICKENS/ROOSTERS ON

THE PROPERTY AND CE IS SO USELESS THAT LAST TIME

IT TOOK US 6 MONTHS TO GO TO THE PROPERTY (THE

ONLY COMPLAINT IS 2020 IN WHICH WE HAD THE CASE

COMPLIED AND CLOSED IN LESS THAN 2 MONTHS) AND WE

NEED TO GET THIS FIXED IMMEDIATLEY BECAUSE HE HAS

THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATORS ADDRESS AND PHONE

NUMBERS. WHEN I ASKED THE ADDRESS FOR THE PROPERTY

HE STATED HE DID NOT KNOW BECAUSE NOBODY HAS

ADDRESSES POSTED IN THIS AREA. I FOUND THE

PROPERTY TO BE 336 ABBUCKLE CREEK RD AND HE

FURTHER EXPLAINED IN ADDITION TO THE CHICKENS THEY

ALSO HAVE MULTIPLE CARS HIDDEN TOWARD THE BACK OF

THE PROPERTY WHICH ARE NOT REGISTERED. I EXPLAINED

THAT DUE TO STATE LAW I WOULD NEED HIS NAME AND

ADDRESS ON THE COMPLAINT AT WHICH POINT HE SAID

THAT WAS AN EXCUSE FOR US TO SCARE PEOPLE AWAY SO

WE DO NOT HAVE TO DO OUR JOBS, THEN COMTINUED TO

STATE THAT HE DIDN'T MIND GIVING HIS NAME BECAUSE

HE HOPES THEY COME ON HIS PROPERTY BECAUSE HE WILL

SHOOT THEM. I EXPLAINED THAT IT WOULD LIKELY TAKE

AT LEAST 1 WEEK BEFORE THE PROPERTY IS INSPECTED

TO WHICK HE SAID THAT IS UNACCEPTABLE AND I BETTER

TALK TO MY SUPERVISON AND GET SOMEONE OUT THERE

IMMEDIATELY I STATED THAT I WOULD TALK TO MY

SUPERVIOR BUT COULD NOT MAKE ANY GUARANTEES.

CALLER WAS VERY RUDE THE ENTIRE TIME, I DO NOT

BELIEVE HE WAS RECORDING BE BECAUSE OF HIS

BEHAVIOR BUT IF HE WAS I ASSUME HE WAS TRYING TO

BAIT ME INTO GETTING ANGRY WITH HIM. GC

Complaint Code(s)

1: KEEP/MAINTAIN FARM ANIMALS

2: VESSELS & VEHICLES

3: POSTING OF NUMBERS ON BUILDING

Notes

2022-04-12 10:47:33

MIKE OODEN - 313 PLEASANT LN

Inspections/Events Detail

DATE	TIME	INSPECTION / EVENT TYPE	INSTRUCTIONS / COMMENTS
06-14-2022	12:44 PM	CLOSE COMPLAINT	CASE CLOSED BY HMOSTLUN
06-14-2022	12:44 PM	CHECK FOR COMPLIANCE	6-14-22 COMP. BSS.HO
05-13-2022	03:43 PM	REINSPECTION	5/13/22 MR REED SIGNED W/CITATION FOR 5-20 UNLICENSED INOPERATIVE VEHICLES ON PROPERTY MUST COMPLY BY 6/12/22 TO REMOVE ALL UNLIC VEHICLES OR OBTAIN TAGS AND PUT IN OPERATIONAL CONDITION HE ADVISED THAT HE WOULD COMPLY AS TO ROOSTERS AND CHICKENS, SAT AND LISTENED FOR FOWL SOUNDS FOR OVER THIRTY MINUTES AND DID NOT OBSERVE OR HEAR ANY ANIMAL NOISES MR REED DID ADMIT THAT HE HAD A ROOSTER AT ONE TIME BUT AFTER TALKING TO NEIGHBOR WHO COMPLAINED, IT SEEMS THAT MR REED AND NEIGHBOR HAVE RESOLVED THE ISSUE AND THE ROOSTER IG NOW GONE HO AND RSS 60
05-10-2022	02:40 PM	UPDATE/NOTES	5-10-22 NEIGHBOR CALLED UPSET THAT CE HASNT BEEN BACK OUT TO PROPERTY, ROOSTER CROWING ALL DAY. HE WANTS CE TO GET OWNER TO REMOVE CHICKENS AND ROOSTER AND DOESN'T WANT CASE TO WEEKS, YELLING AT ME TO DO OUR JOB AND GET RID OF CHICKENS AND ROOSTERS. COULDN'T GET MUCH SAID THEN CALLER HUNG UP ON ME, BSS
04-12-2022	10:46 AM	CREATE COMPLAINT	COMPLAINT RECORDED BY GCLOGSTO
04-12-2022	07:52 AM	INITIAL INSPECTION	4/12/22 UPON ARRIVAL AND ENTERING DRIVEWAY MET BY A PERSON WHO RAPIDLY WALKED TO VEHICLE I STEPPED OUT OF TRUCK AND TRIED TO INTRODUCE SELF AND WAS MET BY THIS IS PRIVATE LAND AND YOU ARE TRESPASSING WHEN I TRIED TO STATE WHY I WAS PRESENT HE INDICATE THT HE KNEW WHY I WAS THERE AT FIRST WAS VERY CRITICALE OF CE AND STATED STORY ABOUT PERSON WHO CALLED AND THAT THIS WAS AN ONGOING DISPUTE WITH HIS NEIGHBOR FOR YEARS HE LATER INDENTIFIED SELF AS MR REED AND INDICATED THAT HE HAS TRIED REPEATELY TO MAKE AMENDS WITH NEIGHBOR WITHOUT SUCCESS MR REED APOLIGIZED FOR HIS BEHAVIOR AND REFUSED TO ALLOW CE OR OTHERS TO WALK HIS PROPERTY AND WE TALKED ABOUT VIOLATIONS HE ACKNOWLEDGED THAT THE TWO TRUCKKS ON PPERTY WERE IN VIOL OF HAVING NO VALID TAGS, BUT WITH COSTS OF INSURANCE AND THEM NOT BEING USED, HE UNDERSTOOD OUR POSITION AND INDICATED THAT HE WOULD REMOVE THEM FROM PROPERTY AND GIFT THEM TO OTHERS WE TALKED ABOUT CHICKENS AND OTHER FARM ANIMALS. DURING OIR ENTIRE PRESENCE ON ROPERTY WE DID NOT OBSERVE OR HEAR OF ANY FOWL HE DID ACKNOWLEDGE HE HAD ONE ROOSTER AND AFTER DISCUSSING PREVIOUS VIOLATIONS HE STATED HE WOULD REMOVE THE ROOSTER OVERALL MR REED WAS COOPERATIVE AND I ADVISED I WOULD REI IN 3 TO 4 WEEKS HO/BSS60