Log in is not required to search. In the red banner above select: I Want To > Search > Permits

Code Enforcement Detail

Code Enforcement Detail
Case Number	CE21030041	complainant
Case Date	03-02-2021	address
Origination	FIELD - FIELD INSPECTOR	Status	C - CLOSED
Operator	tprovenc	Officer	WEST
Fines Balance	$0.00
Lien Balance	$0.00
Total Balance	$0.00
Property On Case
STRAP NBR	C-02-35-28-030-0980-0200	Owner	CARPIO RICHARD G
Unit		Owner Address	P O BOX 8115
Property Address	3505 KEARLY AVE	City/State/Zip	SEBRING FL 33872
City/State/Zip	SEBRING FL 33875-	Phone

Case Description

3/2/2021 ACCUMULATION AND MESH FENCE ADDED TO THE

TOP OF AN EXISTING PRIVACY FENCE BRINGING THE

OVERALL HEIGHT ABOVE WHAT IS PERMITTED ON THE

PROPERTY LINE. TSP

Complaint Code(s)

1: FENCES WALLS HEDGES

2: TRASH

Inspections/Events Detail

DATE	TIME	INSPECTION / EVENT TYPE	INSTRUCTIONS / COMMENTS
03-11-2021	08:59 AM	CLOSE COMPLAINT	CASE CLOSED BY JDAMMANN
03-11-2021	08:59 AM	INITIAL INSPECTION	3-11-2021 FENCING HAS BEEN REMOVED COMPLIED, CLOSE JD 45 MIN
03-09-2021	02:55 PM	UPDATE/NOTES	3/9/2021 RECEIVED A CALL FROM JUDITH ASKING THE STATUS OF ANOTHER COMPLAINT THAT WAS REPORTED BY HER, I INFORMED HER IT WAS CLOSED AND COMPLIED TO WHICH SHE DISAGREED THAT IT WAS, IN CONVERSATION IT WAS BROUGHT TO HER ATTENTION THAT HER OWN PROPERTY HAS AN OPEN CASES INVOLVING A FENCE ABOVE THE HEIGHT REQUIRMENT, SHE DISAGREED WITH THIS AND ASKED TO SPEAK TO CE SUPERVISOR, SHE WAS UNAVAILABLE SO SHE SAID SHE WOULD CALL IN THE NEXT DAY TO SPEAK TO CE SUPERVISOR TO DISCUSS THIS SITUATION. TSP
03-09-2021	08:48 AM	UPDATE/NOTES	3-9-2021 RECIEVED SEVERAL CALLS FROM JUDITH SINCE THE 3RD. INFORMED HER ON A CALL LAST WEEK, THAT CE WOULD LIKE TO WALK HER PROPERTY TO ADDRESS HER CONCERNS REGARDING TRASH/DEBRIS, CONCRETE COMING FROM SHERRY'S PROPERTY ONTO HERS. SHE HAD CALLED IN ON THE 1ST OF MARCH AND INFOMRED CE CLERK THAT THE VIOLATIONS WERE NOT CORRECTED FROM PREVIOUS COMPLAING ON 3513 KEARLY. CE JD WHEN SPEAKING WTIH HER INFORMED HER THAT CE WOULD LIKE TO WALK THE PROPERTY WITH HER SO THAT SHE COULD SHOW CE WHAT CONCERNS SHE HAD FROM HER PROPERTY, SO CE COULD ADDRESS IT, WHEN SHE CAME BACK INTO TOWN. JUDY INFORMED CE THAT IT WOULD BE 2 WEEKS. AT THAT POINT CE OPENED A CASE TO SCHEDULE AN INSPECTION TO FOLLOW UP WITH JUDY. WHILE CE HAD JUDY ON THE PHONE, CE INFORMED HER THAT THERE WERE CONCERNS WITH THE HT. OF THE EXTENTION OF THE PERMITTED CHAIN LINK 6' FENCE. THERE WAS SCRIM ADDED THAT EXTENDS THE THE "FENCE" ABOVE THE ALLOWED 6'. JUDY STATED THAT IT WAS NOT PART OF THE FENCE, AND CE ASKED TO SEE THIS, TO SEE HOW IT WAS INSTALLED, AND THAT CE WOULD REVIEW THIS WITH STAFF. AFTER REVIEW WITH STAFF, IT WAS DETERMIED THAT ANYTHING OVER THE 6' ALLOWED IN RESIDENTIAL, WOULD HAVE TO MEET SET-BACKS FOR THAT ZONING DISTRICT. EMAIL COMPLAINTS WERE ALSO RECIEVED BY NEIGHBORING PROPERTY OWNERS REGARDING THE HEIGHT OF THE FENCE, PER RB. SUPERVISOR. JD/TP 45 MIN
03-03-2021	10:35 AM	CREATE COMPLAINT	COMPLAINT RECORDED BY TPROVENC