Log in is not required to search. In the red banner above select: I Want To > Search > Permits

Code Enforcement Detail

Code Enforcement Detail
Case Number	CE20080141	complainant
Case Date	08-31-2020	address
Origination	WALKN - WALK IN	Status	C - CLOSED
Operator	tprovenc	Officer	CENTRAL
Fines Balance	$0.00
Lien Balance	$0.00
Total Balance	$0.00
Property On Case
STRAP NBR	C-16-36-31-020-0210-0000	Owner	SHELTON GERALD A +
Unit		Owner Address	21 PEACEFUL PL
Property Address	21 PEACEFUL PL	City/State/Zip	LORIDA FL 33857
City/State/Zip	LORIDA FL 33857	Phone

Case Description

8/31/2020 RESIDENT AT 22 PEACFUL PL. CAME IN

STATING THE OWNER OF 21 PEACFUL PL. HAS PLACED A

FENCE ENCROACHING ONTO HIS PROPERTY. THE FENCE

ALSO DOES NOT HAVE A PERMIT. THE RESIDENT PROVIDED

A SURVEY SHOWING THE ENCROACHMENT. *SEE

ATTACHHMENT. TSP

Complaint Code(s)

1: VIOLATION OF SET BACKS

2: FENCES WALLS HEDGES

Inspections/Events Detail

DATE	TIME	INSPECTION / EVENT TYPE	INSTRUCTIONS / COMMENTS
06-14-2021	04:38 PM	UPDATE/NOTES	6/14/2021 SENT TO WAREHOUSE RETAIN UNTIL 12/31/2026
10-14-2020	11:16 AM	CLOSE COMPLAINT	CASE CLOSED BY JOWENS
10-14-2020	11:16 AM	CHECK FOR COMPLIANCE	OK TO CLOSE
10-13-2020	11:16 AM	REINSPECTION	10-12-2020 CE ON SITE. OWNER HAVE COMPLIED OK TO CLOSE THIS CASE JPO 45 MIN
09-14-2020	09:14 AM	UPDATE/NOTES	09-14-2020 CALL RECEVIED FROM GERALD SHELDON WHO ADVISED HE HAS REMOVED FENCE FROM CANAL SIDE AND PLACED NEW FENCE BACK 7 FEET FROM ROAD. CE ADVISED HE STILL NEDED A PERMIT FOR WHAT IS LEFT. HE ADVISED HIS DEED IS MANY YEARS OLDER THAN THE ONE ISSUED LAST YEAR FOR NEXT DOOR AND HIS ATTORNY HAS ADVISED HIM "NOT TO WORRY ABOUT THIS" AS HE IS THE LAND OWNER OF THE 5 FOOT SECTION. HE ADVISED THE SELLER OF THE PLACE NEXT DOR HAD DIMENTIA AND SOLD PROPERTY THAT WAS NOT HERS WHEN THEY RESOLD HER PROPERTY LAST YEAR. JPO 30 MIN
09-11-2020	10:43 AM	UPDATE/NOTES	9/11/2020 GERALD SHELTON (863-243-0351) CALLED WITH MERRIJANE BALLIETT TO ASK FOR FURTHER INSTRUCTIONS ABOUT THE PERMITTING PROCESS, I ADVISED HER THAT PER ZONING SUPERVISOR WE CANNOT SIGN OFF ON A PERMIT AT THE MOMENT UNTIL THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION DISCREPANCY IS RESOLVED BETWEEN THE TWO LAND OWNERS BUT ADVISED THAT PER ENGINEERING THE FENCE BETWEEN THE RAOD AND CANAL AND 6 FT ON OTHER SID EOF ROAD NEEDS TO BE REMOVED. THEY AGREED TO REMOVE IT. TSP
09-11-2020	09:26 AM	INITIAL INSPECTION	09-11-2020 CE ON SITE W CITATION ISSUED FOR SECTION 12.03.110 BUILDING PERMITS REQUIRED + SECTION 12.05.300 SINGLE FAMILY USES IN AU DISTRICT FOR PROPERTY LESS THAN 1 ACRE + SECTION 12.05.306 FENCES, WALLS AND HEDGES + SECTION 12.09.104 ROADWAY DESIGN STANDARDS (RIGHT OF WAY VIOLATIONS. PROPERTY OWNERS ADVISED TO CONTACT ZONING SUPERVISOR FOR FURTHER INSTRUCTIONS ON DEED BETWEEN 2 PROPERTIES BUT FENCE IN ROW AND ON CANAL SIDE MUST BE REMOVED WITHIN 30 DAYS JPO 1 HOUR.
09-01-2020	01:05 PM	UPDATE/NOTES	9/1/2020: UPON REVIEWING THE SURVEY SUBMITTED WHICH SHOWS THE FENCE ENCROACHING 5 FT. INTO THE NEIGHBORING PARCEL, I REALIZED THE SHAPE OF THE PROPERTY DOES NOT MATCH THE SHAPE THAT IS SHOWN ON THE PROPERTY APPRAISER'S WEBSITE. I LOOKED AT THE DEEDS FOR BOTH PARCELS (21 PEACEFUL PL - OR BK 2397 PG 146; 22 PEACEFUL PL - OR BK 2698 PG 1769) AND BOTH LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS INCLUDE THE 5-FT STRIP OF LAND IN QUESTION. THERE WAS NO BUILDING PERMIT PULLED OR ISSUED FOR THE FENCE, WHICH WAS INSTALLED APPROXIMATELY TWO MONTHS AGO, PURSUANT TO THE COMPLAINANT (I COULD NOT LOCATE A PERMIT UPON LOOKING). IF THE OWNER OF 21 PEACEFUL PL CAME IN TODAY TO GET A PERMIT TO SOLVE THE NO-PERMIT ISSUE, WE WOULD NOT BE ABLE TO SIGN OFF ON THE CURRENT PLACEMENT SINCE WE NOW HAVE KNOWLEDGE OF THE DISCREPANCY IN LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS. HOWEVER, WE ALSO CAN'T ENFORCE A SETBACK VIOLATION IF THE FENCE IS LOCATED ON THE PROPERTY LINE ACCORDING TO THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON THE DEED. I SPOKE WITH ENGINEERING DEPT FOR GUIDANCE ON HOW FAR BACK A FENCE WOULD NEED TO BE FROM THE INTERIOR ROADWAY, TO WHICH THEY REPLIED THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENT WOULD BE 6 FEET FOR CLEARANCE AND VISIBILITY. AT MINIMUM, CE WILL GO OUT TO THE PROPERTY AND LET THE HOMEOWNER KNOW THAT THE FENCE MUST MEET A 6 FT SETBACK FROM THE EDGE OF THE ROADWAY ON THE NORTH SIDE, AND MUST BE REMOVED FROM THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE ROAD ALTOGETHER, AS THEIR DEED STATES THIS AREA IS A COMMON NON-EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT. -RLB
08-31-2020	12:50 PM	CREATE COMPLAINT	COMPLAINT RECORDED BY TPROVENC