-     My Account  
   

Log in is not required to search. In the red banner above select: I Want To > Search > Permits

Code Enforcement Detail
Code Enforcement Detail
Case Number CE16090003 complainant  
Case Date 01-06-2017 address  
Origination PHONE - TELEPHONE CALL RECEIVED Status C - CLOSED
Operator jmccoy Officer WEST
Fines Balance $0.00
Lien Balance $0.00
Total Balance $0.00
Property On Case
STRAP NBR C-24-35-28-110-0080-001A Owner GRAY JOHN LESLIE
Unit   Owner Address 161 SEBRING DR
Property Address 6002 APPLE RD City/State/Zip TAVERNIER FL 33070
City/State/Zip SEBRING FL 33875- Phone  
Case Description
SHELL OF A HOUSE. HIGH GRASS. SE CORNER OF LILY
AND APPLE. JAM
Violation Code(s)
1: 5.6-3 -- NUISANCE PROHIBITED
2: INT -- INTEREST ON LIEN
Inspections/Events Detail
DATETIMEINSPECTION / EVENT TYPEINSTRUCTIONS / COMMENTS
04-22-202208:22 AMUPDATE/NOTES04/22/2022 SENT TO WAREHOUSE RETAIN
UNTIL 12/31/2027
09-29-202102:21 PMCLOSE COMPLAINT9/29/2021- SATISFACTION RECORDED PG 2854
PAGE 754.YC
08-23-202102:18 PMUPDATE/NOTES8-23-2021 STOPPED INTEREST AS PAYMENT
WAS RECIEVED BY OUR OFFICE ON 8-19-2021
AND NEVER STOPPED. ALSO SENT DIRECTION
TO THE CLERK TO PREPARE A SOL- NEEDS TO
BE RECORDED NO LATER THAN 9-17 FOR OUR
30 DAY TIME FRAME. JD 45 MIN
08-23-202102:12 PMUPDATE/NOTESIN COMPLIANCE INT
COMPLIANCE DATE WAS : 08/19/21
08-19-202103:51 PMFINE/LIEN PAYMENTFINE PAYMENT: INT
PAYMENT DATE: 08/19/2021
PAYMENT AMOUNT: $881.29
08-19-202103:51 PMFINE/LIEN PAYMENTLIEN PAYMENT
PAYMENT DATE: 08/19/2021
PAYMENT AMOUNT: $1,105.76
04-02-201903:25 PMUPDATE/NOTES4/1/19 JACQUES ROY CALLED CE IN RE HIS
PROPERTY AND HIS INABILITY TO UNDERSTAND
WHAT RIGHT ANY JUDGE HAD TO NOT LISTEN
TO HIS APPEAL HE HAD MAILED IN RE THIS
PROPERTY AND ITS CONDITION. CALLER WAS
NOT PATIENT, WAS NOT INTERESTED IN
LISTENING TO ANYTHING CE HAD TO SAY AND
WANTED US TO KNOW THAT HE HAD CONVINCED
THE PROPERTY APPRAISERS OFFICE TO REDUCE
THE VALUE TO 0.00 AS THE HOUSE WAS NEVER
FINISHED. BECAUSE OF THIS HIS POSITION
WAS CE HAD NO RIGHT TO ENFORCE AND
VIOLATIONS AS “HE” CONSIDERS THIS A
VACANT PIECE OF PROPERTY. CE ADVISED HIM
THERE IS STILL A BUILDING SHELL ON IT
AND UNTIL IT IS REMOVED, CODES WILL BE
ENFORCED. HE THEN STARTED A RANT THAT
THE JUDGE HAS ABUSED HER POWER AND SHE
HAD NO RIGHT TO ORDER THE CLEANING OF
THE PROPERTY AND; ALTHOUGH HE HAS NOT
VISITED THE PROPERTY IN SOME TIME; HE
THREATENED TO BRING LITIGATION AGAINST
US AND THE JUDGE IF ANY OF HIS “SPECIAL”
PLANTINGS WERE DAMAGED OR GONE. AT THAT
POINT CE ADVISED HIM THAT HIS ATTORNEY
CAN CONTACT THE COUNTY ATTORNEY AND WE
COULD NO LONGER SPEAK TO HIM REGARDING
THIS. CE ATTEMPTED FOUR TIMES TO END THE
CONVERSATION, BUT HE KEPT ON SPEAKING
AND TRYING TO RE-VISIT ALL HIS PREVIOUS
POINTS. CE ENDED THE CALL. JPO
02-27-201902:17 PMUPDATE/NOTES2-27-2019 RECEIVED INVOICE FROM POLLARD,
AND SENT W/ PO TO PURCHASING WITH OK TO
PAY. JD 15 MIN
02-22-201911:10 AMUPDATE/NOTES2-22-2019 RECORDED RON OR BK 2678 PG
1888
02-18-201904:37 PMREINSPECTION2-18-2019 PROPERTY HAS BEEN BROUGHT INTO
COMPLIANCE BY COUNTY CONTRACTOR.
RELEASASE NON. JD/JPO 1 HOUR
01-25-201908:51 AMUPDATE/NOTESLEFT A VOICE MAIL FOR STEVEN TO SCHEDULE
THE MOWING OF THE PROPERTY, AS PER
DIRECTED FROM ASST. CO. ATTNY WE HAVE
BEEN GIVEN THE GREEN LIGHT TO MOVE
FORWARD WITH CLEANING UP THE PROPERTY.
JD 15 MIN
01-04-201801:42 PMUPDATE/NOTES1/4/18 CALLER STATED THAT THERE IS STILL
NO ROOF/NO TRUSSES/ONLY BLOCKS AND
CONCRETE/ALSO HIGH GRASS/WEEDS.JAO
04-17-201702:50 PMUPDATE/NOTESJENNIFER,

PLEASE INCLUDE THE BELOW EMAIL IN YOUR
FILE. I DID NOT RESPOND AS I MENTIONED
TO HIM IN HIS PREVIOUS EMAIL THAT I DO
NOT HAVE ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.

THANK YOU,

LINDA

FROM: JACQUES ROY
[MAILTO:JACQUES.PIERRE.ROY@GMAIL.COM]
SENT: MONDAY, APRIL 17, 2017 9:14 AM
TO: CONRAD, LINDA
SUBJECT: RE: 6002 APPLE ROAD REQUEST FOR
REHEARING

FOLLOWING JENNIFER DAMMANN'S MARCH
RESPONSE , I TRIED TO BETTER EXPLAIN MY
OUTLOOK BUT, AFTER READING THE ORDER
DENYING MY REHEARING REQUEST (FROM
SPECIAL MAGISTRATE PAMELA T. KARLSON), I
MUST SAY THAT I FELT VERY SAD TO FIND
OUT THAT, ACCORDING TO HER, THERE WAS NO
ERROR ON A RULING OF LAW AND THAT THE
RULING WAS NOT CONTRARY TO THE EVIDENCE
EVEN IF THE PLANTS LEFT AS ORNAMENTALS
HAD NOT BEEN DETERMINED IN ANY WAY TO BE
ON THE COUNTY'S WEEDS LIST. IF THERE IS
SUCH A LIST, I ALSO FEEL THAT IT SHOULD
BE PROVIDED TO ANYONE CONSIDERED NON
COMPLIANT IN ORDER TO FACILITATE THE
CORRECTIVE PROCESS!
I MENTIONED TO YOU WHY I LEFT SOME
PLANTS AND ALSO READ ABOUT A FEDERAL LAW
THAT ALLOWED ME TO DO SO BUT, ACCORDING
TO MS KARLSON, I AM MISTAKEN! I WAS
HOPING TO MAKE SOME RESEARCH BEFORE
FILING AN APPEAL BUT FELT OBLIGATED TO
RESPOND RIGHT AWAY BECAUSE OF THE TIME
DELAY IMPOSED!
I ALSO TOLD YOU THAT I WAS GOING TO MAKE
MY REASONS FOR APPEALING PUBLIC AS I
FELT THAT EVEN IF THE FEDERAL LAW HAD
BEEN CHANGED, FLORIDA, OF ALL STATES,
SHOULD BE THE ONE TO ENSURE THAT
PEOPLE'S ACTIONS SHOULD NOT CONTRIBUTE
TO THE ACCELERATED MELTING OF GLACIERS
AROUND THE WORLD...
I WAS TRIMMING OR PULLING UNDESIRABLE
PLANTS WITHOUT USING PETROLEUM PRODUCTS
IN ORDER TO KEEP THE AIR CLEAN AND THE
NOISE LEVEL LOW. I KNOW THAT IF ALL
LAWNMOWERS WERE ELECTRIC IT WOULD
CONTRIBUTE TO THE REDUCTION OF
GREENHOUSE'S GAS AND CONSEQUENTLY TO THE
ACCELERATED MELTING; I TOLD THAT EVEN
SMALL ACTS COUNT BUT WOULD NATURALLY BE
ELATED TO SEE FLORIDA RESTRICT THE USE
OF GAS POWERED ENGINES...
TIME FOR CHANGES AND I AM HOPING TO GET
FLORIDIANS' SUPPORT BUT DO NOT EXPECT,
FOLLOWING YOUR LAST EMAIL, TO GET ANY
RETURN
...
A CANADIAN ALIEN,
JACQUES ROY

ON WED, APR 12, 2017 AT 11:23 AM,
CONRAD, LINDA WROTE:
MR. ROY,

PURSUANT TO SEVERAL CONVERSATIONS AND
EMAILS THAT YOU HAD WITH ME AND STAFF,
THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE MADE A DECISION
AND SIGNED AN ORDER REGARDING YOUR
PROPERTY. WE DO NOT HAVE ANY ADDITIONAL
INFORMATION TO PROVIDE TO YOU.

THANK YOU,

LINDA CONRAD
ZONING SUPERVISOR
501 SOUTH COMMERCE AVE.
SEBRING, FL 33870
PHONE: (863) 402-6638
FAX: (863) 402-6651



-----ORIGINAL MESSAGE-----
FROM: JACQUES ROY
[MAILTO:JACQUES.PIERRE.ROY@GMAIL.COM]
SENT: TUESDAY, APRIL 11, 2017 9:53 AM
TO: DAMMANN, JENNIFER

SUBJECT: RE: 6002 APPLE ROAD REQUEST FOR
REHEARING

WHEN I SAW YOU LAST WEEK, I TOLD YOU
THAT I WAS SURPRISED TO FIND 6002 APPLE
IN A CONDITION THAT I STILL JUDGED
ACCEPTABLE MONTHS AFTER MY MAINTENANCE
WORK OF LAST SEPTEMBER (I AM REALISING
THAT THERE IS NOT MUCH GROWTH FROM
OCTOBER TILL APRIL) AND TOOK PICTURES OF
IT ALL. I ASKED YOU IF YOU WANTED TO
TAKE PICTURES BEFORE I PULL THE DEAD DRY
PLANTS AND YOU TOLD ME NO.
I FILED THE APPEAL, PRESENTED IT TO YOU
AND WENT BACK ON APPLE TO PULL THEM
BEFORE DRIVING BACK TO CANADA.
I AM HOPING THAT THE COUNTY WILL FINALLY
AGREE WITH ME ( MAKE THE CHANGES TO THE
COUNTY LAWS IF NEED BE : I AM SUGGESTING
THAT YOU ALLOW AT LEAST AN ISLAND WHERE
ANY NON TOXIC, NON ILLEGAL, NON IRRITANT
PLANTS CAN BE GROWN IN ORDER TO IMPROVE
THE LOOK OF PARCELS WHERE NOT MANY
PLANTS CAN NATURALLY SURVIVE ). I ALSO
MENTIONNED TO YOU THAT THE COUNTY SHOULD
NOT BE SO STRICT WHEN THERE IS NO
HABITABLE STRUCTURE (ESPECIALLY WHEN THE
APPRAISAL CONSIDER THE PROPERTY
VACANT)...
IF THE LAW THAT I REFERRED YOU TO
DOESN'T EXIST, IT WOULD BE AN IMPORTANT
COMPROMISE THAT SHOULD BE ACCEPTED BY
EVERYBODY. YOU COULD ALSO ASK PEOPLE
WHICH PLANTS THEY FIND UNACCEPTABLE AND
INFORM EVERYONE ABOUT IT WHEN A PROBLEM
ARISE : YOU KNOW THAT I AM TRYING TO
PULL ALL THE PLANTS I FIND UNDESIRABLE
AND KEPT ONLY THE ONES I FOUND VERY
ATTRACTIVE AND THIS WHY I AM FIGHTING
THIS ORDER ESPECIALLY AFTER CONSIDERING
THAT ME KARLSON SHOULD HAVE RECOGNISED
THAT MY PROPERTY IS WELL MAINTAINNED AND
THAT I DID NOT SHOW UP FOR REASONNABLE
REASONS, THAT SHE SHOULD NOT HAVE
CONSIDERER THAT I WAS ACCEPTING YOUR
OUTLOOK....
I THANK YOU TO FINALLY REFER ME TO SOME
PEOPLE THAT COULD KEEP MY PROPERTY IN
COMPLIANCE; I WILL PROBABLY CONTACT THEM
IF I DO NOT HAVE TO SHOW UP THIS SUMMER
TO EXPLAIN MY POINT OF VIEW TO THE
APPEAL JUDGE (I AM OF THE OPINION THAT
MY PROPERTY IS IN COMPLIANCE WITH YOUR
CODE).
IF THE COUNTY CAN'T UNDERSTAND MY POINT
OF VIEW AND ENACT CONSEQUENTLY SOME OF
MY RECOMMENDATIONS, I WILL PUT THAT
PROPERTY UP FOR SALE AS I DO NOT WANT TO
DEAL WITH ALL THE AGGRAVATIONS
CONSIDERING MY DOCTORS'
RECOMMENDATIONS...
I AM HOPING THAT THE COUNTY WILL
UNDERSTAND THAT THE LOOK OF IT ALL IS
DIFFERENT WHEN CUT WITH SCISSORS (IT
NATURALLY LOOKS UNEVEN BUT IS UP TO CODE
EXCEPT FOR THE PLANTS THAT I DECIDED TO
KEEP AS ORNEMENTALS).
I AM HOPING TO GET SOME GOOD NEWS FROM
YOU IN ORDER TO RELEASE THE STRESS
CAUSED BY THIS UNFORTUNATE EVENT.
YOURS VERY TRULY, JACQUES ROY

ON SUN, APR 9, 2017 AT 8:06 AM, JACQUES
ROY
WROTE:
> I WENT TO FILE AN APPEAL IN ORDER TO
FIND OUT WHAT YOU ARE GOING TO DO
> ABOUT IT AND WHAT CHIEF JUDGE JACOBSEN
WILL DECIDE.
> I AM SORRY THAT YOU CAN'T AGREE WITH
ME BUT FEEL THAT YOU SHOULD!
> JACQUES ROY
>
> ON APR 5, 2017 8:18 AM, "DAMMANN,
JENNIFER" WROTE:
>>
>> MR. ROY,
>>
>> PLEASE ADVISE, IS YOUR INTENT TO FILE
THE APPEAL WITH THE CLERK OF
>> COURTS WITHIN THE 30 DAY APPEAL
PROCESS?
>>
>>
>> JENNIFER DAMMANN
>> HIGHLANDS COUNTY CODE ENFORCEMENT
OFFICIAL
>> (863) 402-6641 PHONE
>> (863) 402-6651 FAX
>> WWW.HCBCC.NET
>> JDAMMANN@HCBCC.ORG
>> LEGAL NOTICE REGARDING EMAIL
>> SENATE BILL 80 - EFFECTIVE JULY 1,
2006 UNDER FLORIDA LAW, EMAIL
>> ADDRESSES ARE PUBLIC RECORDS. IF YOU
DO NOT WANT YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS
>> RELEASED IN RESPONSE TO A
PUBLIC-RECORDS REQUEST, DO NOT SEND
>> ELECTRONIC EMAIL TO THIS ENTITY.
INSTEAD, CONTACT THIS OFFICE BY
>> PHONE OR IN WRITING.
>>
>>
>>
>> -----ORIGINAL MESSAGE-----
>> FROM: JACQUES ROY
[MAILTO:JACQUES.PIERRE.ROY@GMAIL.COM]
>> SENT: TUESDAY, APRIL 4, 2017 4:35 PM
>> TO: DAMMANN, JENNIFER

>> SUBJECT: RE: 6002 APPLE ROAD REQUEST
FOR REHEARING
>>
>> I SPOKE WITH RAYMOND AND HE TOLD ME
THAT I HAVE TO GIVE THEM A
>> NOTICE OF APPEAL BUT I WONDER IF IT
WILL BE LATE (HE TOLD ME THAT
>> THEY DO NOT USE EMAILS)!?
>> I ALSO FEEL THAT I SHOULD HAVE BEEN
GIVEN THE CHANCE TO EXPLAIN
>> MY CASE IN PERSON OR/AND TO GIVE ME
TIME TO CHECK MY PROPERTY AND
>> DECIDE WHAT NEEDS TO BE DONE ; I AM
MAINTAINING THAT PROPERTY TO MY
>> LIKING, IT IS CLEAN AND I DO NOT SEE
WHY YOU HAVE TO DISTURB ME WITH
>> LAWS THAT SHOULD NOT EVEN BE
ACCORDING TO A RULING THAT I READ ABOUT
>> YEARS AGO. CODE ENFORCEMENT TOLD ME
THAT THEY WERE LOOKING AT IT AND
>> THAT THEY WOULD KEEP ME INFORMED... I
NEVER HEARD FROM YOU BUT
>> RECEIVED A NOTE BACK IN DECEMBER
ASKING ME TO CUT IT UNDER 18 INCHES.
>> I TOLD YOU THAT I DID CUT WHAT I
DECIDED SHOULD BE CUT AND KEPT
>> WHAT I FELT LOOKED NICE AND WILL KEEP
IT LONG IF THEY ARE PERENNIALS
>> BUT WILL PULL IT IF THE PLANTS LOOK
DEAD.
>> YOU SHOULD HAVE ASKED FOR AN ORDER
ONLY IF THERE IS DANGER
>> INVOLVED LIKE DETRITUS, NAILS OR...
BUT MY PROPERTY IS SAFE AND CLEAN.
>> YOU SHOULD EXPLAIN MY POINT OF VIEW
TO THE ONE THAT COMPLAINED AND
>> TELL OUR LEGISLATORS TO STOP ENACTING
LAWS THAT SHOW A LACK OF
>> UNDERSTANDING OF NATURE AND POOR
JUDGEMENT!
>> I WILL GO TO FLORIDA VERY SOON TO
TAKE CARE OF THAT BUSINESS AND
>> WILL GIVE YOU A CALL WHEN I GET
THERE.
>> I AM HOPING THAT WE WILL REACH AN
AGREEMENT.
>> JACQUES ROY
>>
>> ON MON, APR 3, 2017 AT 11:55 AM,
DAMMANN, JENNIFER
>>
>> WROTE:
>> > MR. ROY,
>> >
>> > PER THE ATTACHED, AN APPEAL IS
FILED WITH THE CIRCUIT COURT.
>> >
>> > PLEASE CONTACT THE CLERK OF COURTS
THEY WILL BE ABLE TO ANSWER ANY
>> > QUESTIONS YOU HAVE REGARDING FILING
AN APPEAL. THEY CAN BE
>> > CONTACTED AT 863-402-6565.
>> >
>> > REGARDS,
>> >
>> > JENNIFER DAMMANN
>> > HIGHLANDS COUNTY CODE ENFORCEMENT
OFFICIAL
>> > (863) 402-6641 PHONE
>> > (863) 402-6651 FAX
>> > WWW.HCBCC.NET
>> > JDAMMANN@HCBCC.ORG
>> > LEGAL NOTICE REGARDING EMAIL
>> > SENATE BILL 80 - EFFECTIVE JULY 1,
2006 UNDER FLORIDA LAW, EMAIL
>> > ADDRESSES ARE PUBLIC RECORDS. IF
YOU DO NOT WANT YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS
>> > RELEASED IN RESPONSE TO A
PUBLIC-RECORDS REQUEST, DO NOT SEND
>> > ELECTRONIC EMAIL TO THIS ENTITY.
INSTEAD, CONTACT THIS OFFICE BY PHONE OR
IN WRITING.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > -----ORIGINAL MESSAGE-----
>> > FROM: JACQUES ROY
[MAILTO:JACQUES.PIERRE.ROY@GMAIL.COM]
>> > SENT: MONDAY, APRIL 3, 2017 11:45
AM
>> > TO: DAMMANN, JENNIFER

>> > SUBJECT: RE: 6002 APPLE ROAD
REQUEST FOR REHEARING
>> >
>> > I AM SORRY TO FIND OUT THAT MY
DEMAND HAD BEEN REFUSED. IT
>> > SEEMS TO ME THAT THE ONLY WAY A
JUDGE COULD GIVE SUCH AN ORDER
>> > WOULD BE BY NOT CONSIDERING ANY OF
MY EXPLANATIONS (OR NOT BELIEVING ANY OF
IT)!
>> > I TOLD YOU THAT I HAD TO BE IN
CALIFORNIA AND ASKED FOR A
>> > DELAY; I EVEN TRIED TO FIND SOMEONE
TO PULL THE FEW WEEDS THAT
>> > MIGHT HAVE BEEN LONGER THAT 18
INCHES BUT COULD NOT... YOU MUST
>> > KNOW THAT I TOOK CARE OF MY
PROPERTY IN THE SPRING AND IN THE FALL
>> > 2016 AND HAD BEEN TOLD BY THE CODE
ENFORCEMENT THAT MY PROPERTY
>> > SHOULD BE FINE TILL THE SPRING IF I
WAS TAKING CARE OF IT IN THE FALL AS NOT
MUCH GROW DURING THE DRY SEASON...
>> > I NATURALLY KEEP SOME WEEDS THAT
LOOKED VERY NICE AND WAS
>> > HOPING THAT THEY WERE PERENNIALS (I
WAS GOING TO FIND OUT ON MY
>> > RETURN); I FELT THAT I HAD THE
RIGHT TO DO SO ACCORDING TO SOME
>> > FEDERAL RULING AND HAD NEVER BEEN
INFORMED OF THE OPPOSITE (I WAS
>> > ONLY TOLD THAT SOMEONE WAS CHECKING
IT AND THAT YOU WOULD GET BACK TO ME
LATER)...
>> > JUST TO THINK ABOUT THE MAGNITUDE
OF THE FINE FOR SOMETHING
>> > THAT WAS NOT CREATING ANY HAZARD,
MAKES ME SICK AND FEEL THAT
>> > SOMETHING MUST BE DONE TO STOP SUCH
ABUSES...
>> > DO I HAVE TO SHOW UP TO FILE AN
APPEAL OR CAN I DO IT ON EMAIL?
>> > YOURS VERY TRULY, JACQUES ROY
>> >
>> > ON THU, MAR 30, 2017 AT 1:38 PM,
DAMMANN, JENNIFER
>> >
>> > WROTE:
>> >> MR. ROY,
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> ON MARCH 28, 2017, CODE
ENFORCEMENT RESUBMITTED ALL EVIDENCE TO
>> >> INCLUDE ALL EMAILS, TO THE SPECIAL
MAGISTRATE FOR HER REVIEW IN
>> >> REGARDS TO YOUR REQUEST FOR A
REHEARING.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> PLEASE SEE ATTACHED ORDER DENYING
REHEARING REQUEST.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> I AM ALSO MAILING THESE TO THE
ADDRESS OF RECORD.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO CONTACT
THIS OFFICE IF YOU SHOULD HAVE
>> >> ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS AND/OR
CONCERNS.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> REGARDS,
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> JENNIFER DAMMANN
>> >> HIGHLANDS COUNTY CODE ENFORCEMENT
OFFICIAL
>> >> (863) 402-6641 PHONE
>> >> (863) 402-6651 FAX
>> >> WWW.HCBCC.NET
>> >> JDAMMANN@HCBCC.ORG
>> >> LEGAL NOTICE REGARDING EMAIL
>> >> SENATE BILL 80 - EFFECTIVE JULY 1,
2006 UNDER FLORIDA LAW, EMAIL
>> >> ADDRESSES ARE PUBLIC RECORDS. IF
YOU DO NOT WANT YOUR EMAIL
>> >> ADDRESS RELEASED IN RESPONSE TO A
PUBLIC-RECORDS REQUEST, DO NOT
>> >> SEND ELECTRONIC EMAIL TO THIS
ENTITY. INSTEAD, CONTACT THIS OFFICE
>> >> BY PHONE OR IN WRITING.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>



04-06-201708:25 AMUPDATE/NOTESMR ROY MENTIONED GOING TO THE PRESS W/
HIS CASE, JD EMAILED BD & LC TO INFORM
HIM OF HIS POSSIBLE INTENT. 15 MIN JD
04-06-201708:23 AMUPDATE/NOTES4-6-2017 MR. ROY WAS IN THE OFFICE
SEVERAL TIMES, EXPLAINING HIS VIEW OF
KEEPING THE HIGH GRASS AND WEEDS FOR A
NATURAL LOOKING PROPERTY. AH, HO, AND LC
MET W/ CE. DAMMANN AT THE COUNTER. WE
EXPLAINED THE CODE, AND EXPLAINED THAT
THE MAGISTRATE DENIED HIS REHEARING, AND
GAVE HIM COPIES OF THE EXHIBITS THAT
WERE ENTERED INTO EVIDENCE AT THE MARCH
9, 2017 PUBLIC HEARING, TO INCLUDE
ADDITIONAL CORRESPONDENCE, AND THE ORDER
OF DENYING A REHEARING. MR. ROY FILED AN
APPEAL WITH THE CLERK OF COURTS LATER IN
THE AFTERNOON, AND PRESENTED A COPY OF
THE FILED APPEAL TO INCLUDE A LETTER
FROM HIM, AND EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE. JD
HO AH LC 3 HOURS
03-29-201701:32 PMSPEC MAG REVIEW3-29-2017 SPECIAL MAGISTRATE EXECUTED
ORDER DENYING REHEARING REQEUST.
3-30-2017 MAILED CERT & REG. MAIL,
3-30-2017 EMAILED SCANNED COPY OF ORDER
TO RESPONDENT AS A COURTESY, AS HE
TRAVELS A LOT. JD 1.5 HOUR
03-29-201710:59 AMUPDATE/NOTESAPRIL,

PLEASE SEE THE BELOW EMAIL FROM MR. ROY
REQUESTING A REHEARING.

THANK YOU,


JENNIFER DAMMANN
HIGHLANDS COUNTY CODE ENFORCEMENT
OFFICIAL
(863) 402-6641 PHONE
(863) 402-6651 FAX
WWW.HCBCC.NET
JDAMMANN@HCBCC.ORG
LEGAL NOTICE REGARDING EMAIL
SENATE BILL 80 - EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2006
UNDER FLORIDA LAW, EMAIL ADDRESSES ARE
PUBLIC RECORDS. IF YOU DO NOT WANT YOUR
EMAIL ADDRESS RELEASED IN RESPONSE TO A
PUBLIC-RECORDS REQUEST, DO NOT SEND
ELECTRONIC EMAIL TO THIS ENTITY.
INSTEAD, CONTACT THIS OFFICE BY PHONE OR
IN WRITING.



FROM: JACQUES ROY
[MAILTO:JACQUES.PIERRE.ROY@GMAIL.COM]
SENT: MONDAY, MARCH 27, 2017 1:43 PM
TO: DAMMANN, JENNIFER

SUBJECT: RE: FW: 6002 APPLE ROAD

I AM REQUESTING AN REHEARING AS I DON'T
BELIEVE THAT MY LOT WAS ORVERGROWN, THAT
THE PROBLEM MIGHT HAVE BEEN ON COUNTY'S
LAND ADJACENT TO MINE, THAT I COULD NOT
SHOW UP, THAT MY EMAILS MIGHT NOT HAVE
BEEN CONSIDERED AND THAT THERE MUST BE A
LAW THAT PROTECT US AGAINST SUCH ABUSE
BY LETTING PEOPLE GROW ANY DESIRABLE NON
ILLEGAL PLANT ON THEIR PROPERTY.
THANKS, JACQUES ROY
ON MAR 27, 2017 9:46 AM, "DAMMANN,
JENNIFER" WROTE:
MR. ROY,

THANK YOU FOR YOUR RECENT
CORRESPONDENCE.

THE DOCUMENTS THAT WERE SENT TO YOU
DESCRIBE THE SPECIFIC TIME LINES AND
PROCESSES FOR EITHER A REHEARING OR AN
APPEAL OF THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATES ORDER.

DEADLINE FOR FILING A REHEARING (20 DAYS
AFTER THE EXECUTION OF THE ORDER) MARCH
29, 2017.
DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL (30 DAYS
AFTER EXECUTION OF THE ORDER) APRIL 10,
2017.

TO ENSURE THE ABOVE DEAD-LINES ARE MET,
PLEASE REVIEW THE REQUIREMENTS FOR A
REHEARING (AS PROVIDED BELOW) AND SUBMIT
THE PROPER REQUEST TO OUR CODE
ENFORCEMENT CLERK IN WRITING ON OR
BEFORE THE AFOREMENTIONED DATES, ALONG
WITH YOUR STATEMENT WHY THE ORDER WAS
CONTRARY TO THE EVIDENCE OR INVOLVED IN
ERROR ON A RULING OF LAW THAT WAS
FUNDAMENTAL TO THE DECISION OF THE CODE
ENFORCEMENT SPECIAL MAGISTRATE. THIS
STATEMENT CAN BE ACCEPTED BY EMAIL, AS
YOUR DEADLINE IS APPROACHING.

THE CODE ENFORCEMENT CLERK’S EMAIL IS
JMCCOY@HCBCC.ORG, PLEASE COPY ME AS
WELL.

THANK YOU,
JENNIFER DAMMANN
HIGHLANDS COUNTY CODE ENFORCEMENT
OFFICIAL
(863) 402-6641 PHONE
(863) 402-6651 FAX
WWW.HCBCC.NET
JDAMMANN@HCBCC.ORG
LEGAL NOTICE REGARDING EMAIL
SENATE BILL 80 - EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2006
UNDER FLORIDA LAW, EMAIL ADDRESSES ARE
PUBLIC RECORDS. IF YOU DO NOT WANT YOUR
EMAIL ADDRESS RELEASED IN RESPONSE TO A
PUBLIC-RECORDS REQUEST, DO NOT SEND
ELECTRONIC EMAIL TO THIS ENTITY.
INSTEAD, CONTACT THIS OFFICE BY PHONE OR
IN WRITING.


SEC. 2-363. - REHEARING.
(A) EITHER THE COUNTY OR THE VIOLATOR
MAY REQUEST A REHEARING OF THE DECISION
OF THE CODE ENFORCEMENT SPECIAL
MAGISTRATE. A REQUEST FOR REHEARING
SHALL BE MADE, IN WRITING, AND SHALL BE
FILED WITH THE CODE ENFORCEMENT CLERK
WITHIN 20 DAYS AFTER THE EXECUTION OF
THE ORDER. A REQUEST FOR REHEARING SHALL
BE BASED ONLY ON THE GROUNDS THAT THE
DECISION WAS CONTRARY TO THE EVIDENCE OR
THAT THE HEARING INVOLVED AN ERROR ON A
RULING OF LAW THAT WAS FUNDAMENTAL TO
THE DECISION OF THE CODE ENFORCEMENT
SPECIAL MAGISTRATE. THE WRITTEN REQUEST
FOR REHEARING SHALL SPECIFY THE PRECISE
REASONS FOR THE REQUEST.
(B) THE CODE ENFORCEMENT SPECIAL
MAGISTRATE SHALL MAKE A DETERMINATION AS
TO WHETHER OR NOT TO REHEAR THE MATTER
AND THE DECISION OF THE CODE ENFORCEMENT
SPECIAL MAGISTRATE SHALL BE MADE IN
WRITING. IF THE CODE ENFORCEMENT SPECIAL
MAGISTRATE DETERMINES THAT HE OR SHE
WILL GRANT A REHEARING, THE CODE
ENFORCEMENT SPECIAL MAGISTRATE MAY:
(1) SCHEDULE A HEARING WHERE THE PARTIES
WILL BE GIVEN THE OPPORTUNITY TO PRESENT
EVIDENCE OR ARGUMENT LIMITED TO THE
SPECIFIC REASONS FOR WHICH THE REHEARING
WAS GRANTED; OR
(2) MODIFY OR REVERSE THE PRIOR ORDER,
WITHOUT RECEIVING FURTHER EVIDENCE,
PROVIDED THE CHANGE IS BASED ON A
FINDING THAT THE PRIOR DECISION OF THE
CODE ENFORCEMENT SPECIAL MAGISTRATE
RESULTED FROM A RULING ON A QUESTION OF
LAW WHICH THE CODE ENFORCEMENT SPECIAL
MAGISTRATE HAS DETERMINED WAS AN
ERRONEOUS RULING.
(C) UNTIL A REQUEST FOR REHEARING HAS
BEEN DENIED OR OTHERWISE DISPOSED OF,
THE ORDER OF THE CODE ENFORCEMENT
SPECIAL MAGISTRATE SHALL BE STAYED AND
THE TIME FOR TAKING AN APPEAL, PURSUANT
TO THIS ARTICLE, SHALL NOT COMMENCE TO
RUN UNTIL THE DATE UPON WHICH THE CODE
ENFORCEMENT SPECIAL MAGISTRATE HAS
FINALLY DISPOSED OF THE REQUEST FOR
REHEARING BY DENYING THE REQUEST OR
ISSUES AN ORDER PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION
(B) OF THIS SECTION.
(ORD. NO. 05-06-37, § 2; ORD. NO.
07-08-48, § 4)




FROM: JACQUES ROY
[MAILTO:JACQUES.PIERRE.ROY@GMAIL.COM]
SENT: MONDAY, MARCH 27, 2017 11:31 AM
TO: DAMMANN, JENNIFER

SUBJECT: RE: FW: 6002 APPLE ROAD

I AM LEAVING OCCIDENTAL TODAY, WILL BE
DRIVING BACK EAST AND WILL SHOW UP IN
SEBRING NEXT WEEK TO FILE WHATEVER NEED
TO BE FILE TO CHANGE THIS ORDER.
I WILL NATURALLY TAKE PICTURE OF THE
CONDITION PRESENT (I HAVE PICTURES OF
THE LOT TAKEN AFTER MY WORK LAST FALL)
AND WILL PULL THE DEAD PLANT AS THERE IS
NO NEED FOR THEM.
I WILL SHOW UP AT YOUR OFFICE AND YOU
CAN SHOW ME HOW TO TRANSFER THIS INFO
INTO YOUR COMPUTER AND WILL FILE WHAT
NEEDS TO BE...
I AM HOPING THAT IT WILL BE ACCEPTED AND
SOLVE THE PROBLEM.
YOURS VERY TRULY, JACQUES ROY
ON MAR 27, 2017 5:39 AM, "DAMMANN,
JENNIFER" WROTE:
MR. ROY,

PURSUANT TO YOUR REQUEST PLEASE SEE
BELOW SECTIONS 2-363 REHEARING AND 2-364
APPEALS FROM THE HIGHLANDS COUNTY CODE
OF ORDINANCES.

SEC. 2-363. - REHEARING.
(A) EITHER THE COUNTY OR THE VIOLATOR
MAY REQUEST A REHEARING OF THE DECISION
OF THE CODE ENFORCEMENT SPECIAL
MAGISTRATE. A REQUEST FOR REHEARING
SHALL BE MADE, IN WRITING, AND SHALL BE
FILED WITH THE CODE ENFORCEMENT CLERK
WITHIN 20 DAYS AFTER THE EXECUTION OF
THE ORDER. A REQUEST FOR REHEARING SHALL
BE BASED ONLY ON THE GROUNDS THAT THE
DECISION WAS CONTRARY TO THE EVIDENCE OR
THAT THE HEARING INVOLVED AN ERROR ON A
RULING OF LAW THAT WAS FUNDAMENTAL TO
THE DECISION OF THE CODE ENFORCEMENT
SPECIAL MAGISTRATE. THE WRITTEN REQUEST
FOR REHEARING SHALL SPECIFY THE PRECISE
REASONS FOR THE REQUEST.
(B) THE CODE ENFORCEMENT SPECIAL
MAGISTRATE SHALL MAKE A DETERMINATION AS
TO WHETHER OR NOT TO REHEAR THE MATTER
AND THE DECISION OF THE CODE ENFORCEMENT
SPECIAL MAGISTRATE SHALL BE MADE IN
WRITING. IF THE CODE ENFORCEMENT SPECIAL
MAGISTRATE DETERMINES THAT HE OR SHE
WILL GRANT A REHEARING, THE CODE
ENFORCEMENT SPECIAL MAGISTRATE MAY:
(1) SCHEDULE A HEARING WHERE THE PARTIES
WILL BE GIVEN THE OPPORTUNITY TO PRESENT
EVIDENCE OR ARGUMENT LIMITED TO THE
SPECIFIC REASONS FOR WHICH THE REHEARING
WAS GRANTED; OR
(2) MODIFY OR REVERSE THE PRIOR ORDER,
WITHOUT RECEIVING FURTHER EVIDENCE,
PROVIDED THE CHANGE IS BASED ON A
FINDING THAT THE PRIOR DECISION OF THE
CODE ENFORCEMENT SPECIAL MAGISTRATE
RESULTED FROM A RULING ON A QUESTION OF
LAW WHICH THE CODE ENFORCEMENT SPECIAL
MAGISTRATE HAS DETERMINED WAS AN
ERRONEOUS RULING.
(C) UNTIL A REQUEST FOR REHEARING HAS
BEEN DENIED OR OTHERWISE DISPOSED OF,
THE ORDER OF THE CODE ENFORCEMENT
SPECIAL MAGISTRATE SHALL BE STAYED AND
THE TIME FOR TAKING AN APPEAL, PURSUANT
TO THIS ARTICLE, SHALL NOT COMMENCE TO
RUN UNTIL THE DATE UPON WHICH THE CODE
ENFORCEMENT SPECIAL MAGISTRATE HAS
FINALLY DISPOSED OF THE REQUEST FOR
REHEARING BY DENYING THE REQUEST OR
ISSUES AN ORDER PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION
(B) OF THIS SECTION.
(ORD. NO. 05-06-37, § 2; ORD. NO.
07-08-48, § 4)

SEC. 2-364. - APPEALS.
AN AGGRIEVED PARTY, INCLUDING THE
COUNTY, MAY APPEAL A FINAL
ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER OF THE CODE
ENFORCEMENT SPECIAL MAGISTRATE TO THE
CIRCUIT COURT. SUCH AN APPEAL SHALL NOT
BE A HEARING DE NOVO BUT SHALL BE
LIMITED TO APPELLATE REVIEW OF THE
RECORD CREATED BEFORE THE CODE
ENFORCEMENT SPECIAL MAGISTRATE. EXCEPT
AS PROVIDED IN SUBSECTION (C) OF SECTION
2-363, AN APPEAL MUST BE FILED WITHIN 30
DAYS AFTER THE EXECUTION OF THE ORDER TO
BE APPEALED.
(ORD. NO. 05-06-37, § 2; ORD. NO.
10-11-07, § 12)
THE PROPERTY IS IN VIOLATION OF SECTIONS
5.6-3(NUISANCE PROHIBITED) AND
5.6-2(1)(HIGH GRASS/WEEDS), SEE BELOW.
SEC. 5.6-3. - PROHIBITIONS.
IT SHALL BE UNLAWFUL FOR ANY PERSON TO
CREATE A NUISANCE OR SUFFER OR PERMIT A
NUISANCE TO EXIST UPON PROPERTY WHICH IS
UNDER CARE, CUSTODY OR CONTROL.
(ORD. NO. 89-3, § 3; ORD. NO. 92-7, § 3;
ORD. NO. 92-23, § 1; ORD. NO. 94-13, §
1)
SEC. 5.6-2. - ILLUSTRATIVE ENUMERATION.
THE MAINTAINING, USING, PLACING,
DEPOSITING, LEAVING OR PERMITTING TO BE
OR REMAIN ON ANY PUBLIC OR PRIVATE
PROPERTY OF ANY OF THE FOLLOWING ITEMS,
CONDITIONS OR ACTIONS IS HEREBY DECLARED
TO BE AND CONSTITUTE A NUISANCE,
PROVIDED THAT THIS ENUMERATION SHALL NOT
BE CONSTRUED AS A DESIGNATION OF ALL
NUISANCES:
(1) ANY WEEDS, SUCH AS BROOM GRASS,
JIMSON, BURDOCK, RAGWEED, SANDSPUR OR
OTHER SIMILAR WEEDS OR ANY OTHER
VEGETATION, OTHER THAN TREES, ORNAMENTAL
BUSHES, FLOWERS OR OTHER ORNAMENTAL
PLANTS WITH A HEIGHT EXCEEDING 18
INCHES.
(2) ACCUMULATION OF TRASH, LITTER,
DEBRIS, GARBAGE, BOTTLES, PAPER, CANS,
RAGS, DEAD OR DECAYED FISH, FOWL, MEAT
OR OTHER ANIMAL MATTER, FRUIT,
VEGETABLES, OFFAL, BRICKS, CONCRETE,
SCRAP LUMBER OR OTHER BUILDING DEBRIS OR
OTHER REFUSE OF ANY NATURE.
(3) ANY CONDITION WHICH PROVIDES
HARBORAGE FOR RATS, MICE AND OTHER
VERMIN.
(4) ANY BUILDING OR OTHER STRUCTURE
WHICH IS IN SUCH A DILAPIDATED CONDITION
THAT IT IS UNFIT FOR HUMAN HABITATION OR
KEPT IN SUCH AN UNSANITARY CONDITION
THAT IT IS A MENACE TO THE HEALTH OF
PEOPLE RESIDING IN THE VICINITY THEREOF
OR PRESENTS A MORE THAN ORDINARY DANGER
OF FIRE HAZARD IN THE VICINITY WHERE IT
IS LOCATED.
(5) THIS CHAPTER SHALL NOT APPLY TO
UNIMPROVED LOTS, PARCELS OR TRACTS OF
LAND COVERED BY LIVING GRASSES, WEEDS OR
OTHER GROWTH TYPICAL OF FLORIDA,
PASTURELAND, ORANGE GROVES OR OTHER
LANDS USED FOR FARMING PURPOSES OR THOSE
LANDS PROTECTED BY OTHER LEGISLATION,
PROVIDED THESE LANDS ARE IN FULL
COMPLIANCE WITH ALL OTHER LEGISLATION.
(ORD. NO. 89-3, § 2; ORD. NO. 89-17;
ORD. NO. 92-7, § 2; ORD. NO. 92-23, § 1;
ORD. NO. 94-13, § 1)
PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO CONTACT OUR
OFFICE IF YOU SHOULD HAVE ADDITIONAL
QUESTIONS AND/OR CONCERNS.
REGARDS,
JENNIFER DAMMANN
HIGHLANDS COUNTY CODE ENFORCEMENT
OFFICIAL
(863) 402-6641 PHONE
(863) 402-6651 FAX
WWW.HCBCC.NET
JDAMMANN@HCBCC.ORG
LEGAL NOTICE REGARDING EMAIL
SENATE BILL 80 - EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2006
UNDER FLORIDA LAW, EMAIL ADDRESSES ARE
PUBLIC RECORDS. IF YOU DO NOT WANT YOUR
EMAIL ADDRESS RELEASED IN RESPONSE TO A
PUBLIC-RECORDS REQUEST, DO NOT SEND
ELECTRONIC EMAIL TO THIS ENTITY.
INSTEAD, CONTACT THIS OFFICE BY PHONE OR
IN WRITING.







FROM: JACQUES ROY
[MAILTO:JACQUES.PIERRE.ROY@GMAIL.COM]
SENT: SATURDAY, MARCH 25, 2017 9:38 AM
TO: DAMMANN, JENNIFER

SUBJECT: RE: FW: 6002 APPLE ROAD

SINCE YOU CAN'T GET THE MAGISTRATE TO
COMMUNICATE WITH ME FOR SOME
EXPLANATIONS, IT SEEMS THAT I WILL HAVE
TO GET THERE AND FILE AN APPEAL IF YOU
ARE PLANNING TO CONSIDER THE ORDER AND
PROCEED IN SPITE OF ALL MY EXPLANATIONS
AND MY WISH THAT AT LEAST THE LAW I WAS
TRYING TO REFER YOU TO WOULD BE
CONSIDERED!
IF IT DOESN'T EXIST I COULD UNDERSTAND
THE OUTCOME BUT I WAS HOPING FOR AT
LEAST A REFERENCE TO IT AND/OR SOME
EXPLANATIONS..
COULD YOU PLEASE LET ME KNOW WHEN I HAVE
TO PROCEED AS I DID NOT GET TO THE POST
OFFICE IN TIME TO GET THE CERTIFIED
LETTER THAT MY FRIEND TOLD ME WAS THERE
AND MUST HAVE INCLUDED THAT INFO.
VERY TRULY YOURS, JACQUES ROY
ON MAR 24, 2017 7:29 PM, "JACQUES ROY"
WROTE:
I JUST WANT TO LET YOU KNOW THAT SOMEONE
CALL THE POLICE TWICE ON ME WHEN I FIRST
WENT TO MAINTAIN MY PROPERTY! AS THERE
WAS NO GROUND FOR AN ARREST, CODE
ENFORCEMENT WAS CONTACTED...
HOW CAN YOU STAND FOR THAT?
DON'T YOU THINK IT IS TIME FOR YOU TO
ADAPT YOUR LAWS?
JACQUES ROY
P.S.: THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A FLOWER
AND A WEED IS A JUDGMENT.
- UNKNOWN
ON MAR 24, 2017 5:15 AM, "DAMMANN,
JENNIFER" WROTE:
MR. ROY,

THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE RECEIVES THE
EVIDENCE PACKET FOR HER REVIEW, A WEEK
PRIOR AND AT THE PUBLIC HEARING WHICH
WAS HELD ON MARCH 9, 2017.

AS IT WOULD BE A CONFLICT FOR ME, AS
CODE ENFORCEMENT TO CONTACT THE SPECIAL
MAGISTRATE; PAMELA T. KARLSON DIRECTLY,
I WOULD NOT BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH
FLORIDA STATUTES TO CONTACT HER TO
REQUEST FOR HER TO RESPOND TO YOUR EMAIL
INQUIRY.

IF YOU SHOULD HAVE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS
AND/OR CONCERNS PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE
TO CONTACT OUR OFFICE.

REGARDS,
JENNIFER DAMMANN
HIGHLANDS COUNTY CODE ENFORCEMENT
OFFICIAL
(863) 402-6641 PHONE
(863) 402-6651 FAX
WWW.HCBCC.NET
JDAMMANN@HCBCC.ORG
LEGAL NOTICE REGARDING EMAIL
SENATE BILL 80 - EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2006
UNDER FLORIDA LAW, EMAIL ADDRESSES ARE
PUBLIC RECORDS. IF YOU DO NOT WANT YOUR
EMAIL ADDRESS RELEASED IN RESPONSE TO A
PUBLIC-RECORDS REQUEST, DO NOT SEND
ELECTRONIC EMAIL TO THIS ENTITY.
INSTEAD, CONTACT THIS OFFICE BY PHONE OR
IN WRITING.



FROM: JACQUES ROY
[MAILTO:JACQUES.PIERRE.ROY@GMAIL.COM]
SENT: WEDNESDAY, MARCH 22, 2017 11:45 AM
TO: DAMMANN, JENNIFER

SUBJECT: RE: FW: 6002 APPLE ROAD

IT SEEMS THAT YOU PRESENTED MY FEBRUARY
22,24,27 AND MARCH 3+8 ELECTRONIC
CORRESPONDENCE TO THE CODE ENFORCEMENT
SPECIAL MAGISTRATE (PAMELA T. KARLSON)
FOR CASE # CE16090003 BUT THERE IS NO
EVIDENCE THAT SHE READ IT!
I AM CONSIDERING THAT MY EXPLANATIONS
WARRANT A DIFFERENT OUTCOME. I FEEL THAT
IT IS NOT FAIR AND NEED SOME
EXPLANATIONS FROM MS KARLSON. IF I DO
NOT GET IT BY EMAIL WITHIN A WEEK, I
WILL HAVE TO APPEAL THE DECISION.
YOURS VERY TRULY, J. ROY
ON MAR 21, 2017 12:51 PM, "DAMMANN,
JENNIFER" WROTE:
MR. ROY,

IN RESPONSE TO YOUR EMAIL BELOW, THE
CODE ENFORCEMENT SPECIAL MAGISTRATE
REVIEWED ALL EXHIBITS AND ADMITTED THEM
INTO EVIDENCE, INCLUDING ALL
CORRESPONDENCE AT THE MARCH 9, 2017,
PUBLIC HEARING. I CAN MAIL YOU THE
EXHIBIT PACKAGE IF YOU CAN PLEASE
PROVIDE TO ME AN ADDRESS AS TO WHERE YOU
WOULD LIKE FOR IT TO BE SENT.

PLEASE ADVISE WHAT ADDITIONAL
INFORMATION YOU WOULD LIKE TO RECEIVE
FROM THE LIST BELOW:

1. DRAFT MINUTES FROM THE PUBLIC HEARING
HELD ON MARCH 9, 2017, ALSO AT .15
CENTER PER PAGE (AT 2 PAGES) $0.30
2. AUDIO TRANSCRIPT CD WHICH WOULD BE
.35 CENTS.

PLEASE BE ADVISED THE COUNTY WOULD
REQUIRE PAYMENT PRIOR TO MAILING THE
REQUESTED INFORMATION. WE ACCEPT CHECKS,
MONEY ORDERS AND/OR CASHIER’S CHECKS
PAYABLE TO HCBCC (HIGHLANDS COUNTY BOARD
OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS); MAILED TO CODE
ENFORCEMENT, 501 S. COMMERCE AVENUE,
SEBRING, FLORIDA 33870.

I WOULD ALSO REQUIRE AN ADDRESS THAT YOU
WOULD LIKE THIS INFORMATION FORWARDED TO
AFTER PAYMENT IS RECEIVED.

THANK YOU,
JENNIFER DAMMANN
HIGHLANDS COUNTY CODE ENFORCEMENT
OFFICIAL
(863) 402-6641 PHONE
(863) 402-6651 FAX
WWW.HCBCC.NET
JDAMMANN@HCBCC.ORG
LEGAL NOTICE REGARDING EMAIL
SENATE BILL 80 - EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2006
UNDER FLORIDA LAW, EMAIL ADDRESSES ARE
PUBLIC RECORDS. IF YOU DO NOT WANT YOUR
EMAIL ADDRESS RELEASED IN RESPONSE TO A
PUBLIC-RECORDS REQUEST, DO NOT SEND
ELECTRONIC EMAIL TO THIS ENTITY.
INSTEAD, CONTACT THIS OFFICE BY PHONE OR
IN WRITING.








FROM: JACQUES ROY
[MAILTO:JACQUES.PIERRE.ROY@GMAIL.COM]
SENT: MONDAY, MARCH 20, 2017 3:29 PM
TO: DAMMANN, JENNIFER

SUBJECT: RE: FW: 6002 APPLE ROAD

IT WAS HARD TO READ THE DOCUMENT THAT
YOU. E-MAILED ME BUT IT LOOKS LIKE THE
ONE THAT MY FRIEND JUST GOT FROM HER
P.O.BOX.
SHE IS BACK AND I CONSEQUENTLY CAN GO
BACK EAST AND WILL DO SOMETHING ABOUT
THIS ORDER : YOU PROMISED THAT YOU WERE
GOING TO SHOW MY EMAILS TO THE JUDGE BUT
THERE IS NO MENTION ABOUT ANY OF MY
CONCERNS!
I FEEL THAT THE JUDGE DID NOT GET MY
DOCUMENTS OR DID NOT READ THEM, I FEEL
THAT THERE IS NEGLIGENCE!
I CONSEQUENTLY WANT A TRANSCRIPT OF THE
TRIAL AND I AM NOT ACCEPTING THE ORDER
TILL THE JUDGE MENTION THAT MY DOCUMENTS
HAD BEEN CONSIDERED AND THAT THE LAW I
REFERRED YOU TO HAD BEEN CHANGED.
I WILL SOON BE BACK IN SEBRING AND DO
NOT NEED ANYONE TO CORRECT THE SUPPOSED
VIOLATION.
AS I TOLD YOU BEFORE, IF THE CITY IS
USURPING MY RIGHTS AS AN OWNER, THERE
WILL BE LEGAL CONSEQUENCES.
YOURS VERY TRULY, JACQUES ROY
ON MAR 20, 2017 5:21 AM, "DAMMANN,
JENNIFER" WROTE:
MR. ROY,

PLEASE SEE ATTACHED ORDER FROM THE
PUBLIC HEARING HELD ON MARCH 9, 2017.
THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE GRANTED THE
COUNTY THROUGH THE ATTACHED ORDER TO
MOW/WEED THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 6002
APPLE ROAD.

PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO CONTACT ME IF
YOU SHOULD HAVE ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS. I
AM SORRY FOR THE DELAY, AS I WAS OUT OF
THE OFFICE.

REGARDS,
JENNIFER DAMMANN
HIGHLANDS COUNTY CODE ENFORCEMENT
OFFICIAL
(863) 402-6641 PHONE
(863) 402-6651 FAX
WWW.HCBCC.NET
JDAMMANN@HCBCC.ORG
LEGAL NOTICE REGARDING EMAIL
SENATE BILL 80 - EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2006
UNDER FLORIDA LAW, EMAIL ADDRESSES ARE
PUBLIC RECORDS. IF YOU DO NOT WANT YOUR
EMAIL ADDRESS RELEASED IN RESPONSE TO A
PUBLIC-RECORDS REQUEST, DO NOT SEND
ELECTRONIC EMAIL TO THIS ENTITY.
INSTEAD, CONTACT THIS OFFICE BY PHONE OR
IN WRITING.



FROM: JACQUES ROY
[MAILTO:JACQUES.PIERRE.ROY@GMAIL.COM]
SENT: SUNDAY, MARCH 19, 2017 1:21 PM
TO: DAMMANN, JENNIFER

SUBJECT: RE: FW: 6002 APPLE ROAD

YOU DID NOT UPDATE ME AFTER THE HEARING.
WHAT IS GOING ON.
I WILL BE ABLE TO LEAVE CALIFORNIA NEXT
WEEK AND SHOULD BE IN FLORIDA ONE MONTH
EARLIER THAN PLANNED.
I AM HOPING THAT IT WILL SETTLE THE
MATTER.
JACQUES ROY
ON MAR 8, 2017 8:49 AM, "DAMMANN,
JENNIFER" WROTE:
MR. ROY,

I WILL ADD THIS CORRESPONDENCE INTO
EVIDENCE TO BE PRESENTED TO THE SPECIAL
MAGISTRATE.

THE ENTIRE PROPERTY HAS SEVERAL AREAS OF
GRASS/WEEDS THAT ARE OVER 18”, NOT JUST
IN FRONT OF THE GARAGE, AS PRESENTED TO
YOU IN PHOTOS BACK IN DECEMBER.

I WILL UPDATE YOU AFTER THE PUBLIC
HEARING TOMORROW, MARCH 9, 2017 AS TO
HER FINDINGS.

REGARDS,
JENNIFER DAMMANN
HIGHLANDS COUNTY CODE ENFORCEMENT
OFFICIAL
(863) 402-6641 PHONE
(863) 402-6651 FAX
WWW.HCBCC.NET
JDAMMANN@HCBCC.ORG
LEGAL NOTICE REGARDING EMAIL
SENATE BILL 80 - EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2006
UNDER FLORIDA LAW, EMAIL ADDRESSES ARE
PUBLIC RECORDS. IF YOU DO NOT WANT YOUR
EMAIL ADDRESS RELEASED IN RESPONSE TO A
PUBLIC-RECORDS REQUEST, DO NOT SEND
ELECTRONIC EMAIL TO THIS ENTITY.
INSTEAD, CONTACT THIS OFFICE BY PHONE OR
IN WRITING.



FROM: JACQUES ROY
[MAILTO:JACQUES.PIERRE.ROY@GMAIL.COM]
SENT: WEDNESDAY, MARCH 8, 2017 10:26 AM
TO: DAMMANN, JENNIFER

SUBJECT: RE: FW: 6002 APPLE ROAD

I COULD NOT FIND PATRICK PHONE NUMBER
WITH THE INFO I GOT AND DID NOT KNOW HOW
TO CONTACT SOMEONE TO TAKE CARE OF THE
WEEDS IN FRONT OF THE GARAGE AS IT LOOKS
AS THE ONLY PLACE WHERE IT IS TOO LONG
ON THIS PROPERTY.
I AM TRUSTING THAT YOU COULD EASILY
EXPLAIN THE CIRCUMSTANCES TO THE
PLAINTIFF IF THEY FOLLOW UP AND IF THE
JUDGE GIVE ME MORE TIME TO BUILT THE
ENTRANCE AND AUTOMATICALLY SOLVE THE
PROBLEM IN THE PROCESS!
JACQUES ROY
ON FEB 22, 2017 3:34 PM, "JACQUES ROY"
WROTE:
I SPENT HOURS COMPOSING THE PROMISED
RESPONSE AFTER TAKING TO YOU EARLIER
TODAY AND IT DISAPPEARED FROM THE SCREEN
WHILE I WAS TAKING MY CELL PHONE
SOMEWHERE ELSE. IT IS THE SECOND TIME
THIS HAPPENS BUT COULD AT LEAST CONTACT
YOU THIS TIME BY PUSHING REDIAL!
I EXPLAINED TO YOU THAT I AM HOUSE
SITTING TILL THE END OF MARCH, THAT L
COULD NOT GET ACCESS TO MY MAIL THEN AS
I DO NOT HAVE THE KEY TO THE BOX.
THE PICTURES THAT CAME WITH THIS EMAIL
SEEM BIGGER AND I NOTICED THAT ONLY A
FEW PUFF OF VEGETATION LOOK LONG, THAT
MOST OF IT SEEMS UP TO CODE. WHY CAN'T
YOU JUST TELL THE PLAINTIFFS THAT IT IS
ACCEPTABLE TILL THE NEXT GROWING SEASON,
THAT I DECIDED TO KEEP SOME OF THE SO
CALLED WEEDS BECAUSE I LIKE THEM?
EXPLAIN TO THEM THAT THE OWNER IS DOING
ITS BEST TO KEEP IT NICE, THAT YOU WILL
PROCEED IF THE OWNER REALLY DOESN'T TAKE
GOOD CARE OF IT, THAT YOU SPOKE WITH ME
AND TOLD YOU THAT I WOULD REASONABLY
MAINTAIN IT TILL I FINISH THE HOUSE. I
AM SURE THAT IT WOULD HAVE CLOSED THE
MATTER! CAN'T YOU SEE WHO YOU ARE
DEALING WITH AND ACT IN CONSEQUENCE?
I MENTIONED TO YOU THAT I LOST THE PHONE
WITH MY FLORIDA'S ADDRESSES AND COULD
NOT GET IN TOUCH WITH THE TWO GUYS I
KNOW AND WITH MY LADY NEIGHBOR. YOU TOLD
ME TO TRY TO CONTACT PEOPLE THAT DO THIS
KIND OF WORK BUT IT IS TOO COMPLICATED
FOR ME; I DON'T KNOW HOW TO GET IN TOUCH
AND WOULD PREFER TO DO THE JOB MYSELF
NEXT MAY. YOU TOLD ME THAT IT DOESN'T
WORK THAT WAY, THAT IT HAS TO BE DONE
WITHIN A CERTAIN DELAY.
I WOULD UNDERSTAND THE URGENCY IF THERE
WAS DANGER BUT I DON'T BELIEVE THAT THIS
IS THE CASE. YOU SPEAK ABOUT SNAKES AND
RATS BUT TOLD YOU THAT I NEVER SAW ANY
AND FEEL THAT IT WOULD BE MORE LIKELY TO
FIND THEM IN THE COMPLETELY JUNGLE LIKE
LOTS NEXT TO MINE!
I FEEL THAT YOUR REFUSAL TO ACCEPT MY
PROPOSAL IS UNACCEPTABLE; I FEEL THAT
YOU SHOULD DROP THIS CASE AND BE
SATISFIED WITH THE WAY I MAINTAIN THIS
PROPERTY CONSIDERING THE CIRCUMSTANCES :
THERE IS NO RESIDENCE ON THIS LOT, I AM
DOING EVERYTHING I CAN TO KEEP IT FINE
TILL I START TO FINISH IT AFTER THE FOUR
YEARS WAITING PERIOD TO MAKE SURE THAT
THE PEOPLE THAT LOST IT TO UNPAID TAXES
CAN'T CLAIM IT ANYMORE AND YOU EVEN TOLD
ME LAST SPRING THAT YOU FELT CONFIDENT
THAT TAKING CARE OF IT TWICE A YEAR
SHOULD BE SUFFICIENT...
GIVE ME A BREAK AND WAIT TILL MAY. I AM
QUITE SURE THAT THE JUDGE WILL GIVE ME
THE OPPORTUNITY TO REPRESENT MYSELF AND
EVEN DISMISS THE CASE IF YOU PROCEED
HASTILY!
ON FEB 16, 2017 6:16 AM, "DAMMANN,
JENNIFER" WROTE:
MR. ROY,

THE BELOW EMAIL WAS FORWARDED TO YOU ON
JANUARY 9, 2017, ALONG WITH MAILING TO
YOUR PO BOX 642 AS WELL AS 16460 WILLOW
CREEK ROAD, OCCIDENTAL, CA 95465.

ARE YOU IN RECEIPT OF THIS
CORRESPONDENCE?

ALSO, PLEASE BE AWARE THAT WE HAVE
RECEIVED ANOTHER COMPLAINT ON YOUR
PROPERTY LOCATED 6002 APPLE ROAD,
SEBRING, FLORIDA REGARDING TENT CAMPING
ON THIS PARCEL. PLEASE BE AWARE, THAT
CAMPING IN A RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT
IS PROHIBITED.

PLEASE BE AWARE THAT THE COUNTY IS
MOVING FORWARD WITH THE PUBLIC HEARING
ON MARCH 9, 2017.

THANK YOU,


JENNIFER DAMMANN
HIGHLANDS COUNTY CODE ENFORCEMENT
OFFICIAL
(863) 402-6641 PHONE
(863) 402-6651 FAX
WWW.HCBCC.NET
JDAMMANN@HCBCC.ORG
LEGAL NOTICE REGARDING EMAIL
SENATE BILL 80 - EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2006
UNDER FLORIDA LAW, EMAIL ADDRESSES ARE
PUBLIC RECORDS. IF YOU DO NOT WANT YOUR
EMAIL ADDRESS RELEASED IN RESPONSE TO A
PUBLIC-RECORDS REQUEST, DO NOT SEND
ELECTRONIC EMAIL TO THIS ENTITY.
INSTEAD, CONTACT THIS OFFICE BY PHONE OR
IN WRITING.



-----ORIGINAL MESSAGE-----
FROM: DAMMANN, JENNIFER
SENT: MONDAY, JANUARY 9, 2017 8:51 AM
TO: 'JACQUES ROY'

CC: HARTSEIL, APRIL

SUBJECT: RE: 6002 APPLE ROAD

MR. ROY,

BY WAY OF THIS EMAIL I AM ADVISING YOU
OF NOTICE OF VIOLATION # 3255 WRITTEN ON
JANUARY 6, 2017 FOR HIGH GRASS/WEEDS ON
YOUR PROPERTY 6002 APPLE ROAD, SEBRING,
FLORIDA. PLEASE COMPLY THIS PROPERTY ON
OR BEFORE FEBRUARY 5, 2017 TO AVOID AN
IMPOSITION OF A LIEN AT THE PUBLIC
HEARING SCHEDULED FOR MARCH 9, 2017, AT
1:30 P.M. OR SOON THEREAFTER.

THE PROPERTY IS IN VIOLATION OF
HIGHLANDS COUNTY CODE OF ORDINANCES,
SECTION 5.6-3(NUISANCE PROHIBITED) AND
5.6-2(1)(HIGH GRASS/WEEDS OVER 18"). ON
DECEMBER 1, 2016 I INFORMED YOU THAT
THERE WAS ANOTHER COMPLIANT IN REGARDS
TO THE GRASS/WEEDS ON YOUR PROPERTY, AS
YOU HAD ASKED CODE ENFORCEMENT TO DO
PREVIOUSLY. I DO UNDERSTAND YOUR
FRUSTRATION, WANTING TO ALLOW A HABITAT
FOR INSECTS AND BIRDS OF ALL KINDS,
HOWEVER, THIS PROPERTY IS ZONED
R-1(RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT), AND NOT
NATURE CONSERVATION. WITH THAT BEING
SAID, THIS PROPERTY IS TO BE MAINTAINED
TO THE STANDARDS OF THE CODE.

PLEASE ACCEPT THIS VIOLATION AS NOTICE
TO MOW ALL GRASS AND WEEDS TO COMPLY
WITH CODE AND REMOVING ALL ASSOCIATED
DEBRIS (DEPOSITING WITH AN AUTHORIZED
LANDFILL) AND CONTINUE TO MAINTAIN THIS
PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CODE.

DO NOT HESITATE TO CONTACT THIS OFFICE
IF YOU SHOULD HAVE ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS
AND/OR CONCERNS.

REGARDS,

JENNIFER DAMMANN
HIGHLANDS COUNTY CODE ENFORCEMENT
OFFICIAL
(863) 402-6641 PHONE
(863) 402-6651 FAX
WWW.HCBCC.NET
JDAMMANN@HCBCC.ORG
LEGAL NOTICE REGARDING EMAIL
SENATE BILL 80 - EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2006
UNDER FLORIDA LAW, EMAIL ADDRESSES ARE
PUBLIC RECORDS. IF YOU DO NOT WANT YOUR
EMAIL ADDRESS RELEASED IN RESPONSE TO A
PUBLIC-RECORDS REQUEST, DO NOT SEND
ELECTRONIC EMAIL TO THIS ENTITY.
INSTEAD, CONTACT THIS OFFICE BY PHONE OR
IN WRITING.



-----ORIGINAL MESSAGE-----
FROM: JACQUES ROY
[MAILTO:JACQUES.PIERRE.ROY@GMAIL.COM]
SENT: SUNDAY, DECEMBER 18, 2016 12:18 PM
TO: DAMMANN, JENNIFER

SUBJECT: RE: 6002 APPLE ROAD

AS I TOLD YOU BEFORE, AFTER RECEIVING
YOUR NOTICE, I WENT DOWN TO CENTRAL
FLORIDA TO CLEAN, MAINTAIN AND LANDSCAPE
MY PROPERTY LOCATED ON APPLE ROAD. I CUT
THE UNDESIRABLE PLANTS AND AM CERTAIN
THAT IF YOU COMPARE THE PICTURES TAKEN
THEN AND THE ONE THAT YOU JUST SEND, YOU
WILL SEE THAT I TRIMMED MOST PLANTS TO
CODE BUT LEFT STANDING THE ONES THAT I
FOUND ATTRACTIVE. I AM SORRY IF YOU FEEL
THAT MY JOB IS NOT TO CODE BUT YOU MUST
KNOW THAT THESE SO CALLED WEEDS COULD BE
CONSIDERED BY SOME AS DECORATIVE PLANTS.
HOW CAN YOU JUSTIFY YOUR DEMANDS? THIS
PROPERTY IS WELL MAINTAINED AND YOU MUST
KNOW THAT MANY VACANT LOTS IN THE AREA
ALSO HAVE TALL "WEEDS" THAT MAKE A NICE
HABITAT FOR INSECTS AND BIRDS OF ALL
KINDS. DON'T TELL ME THAT YOU WOULD
PREFER IT IF SOMEONE WAS GOING TO USE
HERBICIDES TO SOLVE A MAKE BELIEVE
PROBLEM...
DON'T YOU FEEL THAT IT IS ABOUT TIME
THAT THE CITY STARTS TO EDUCATE ITS
CITIZENS TO ACCEPT AND CHERISH NATURE IN
ITS NATURAL EXPRESSION AND RESPECT THE
DECISION OF THE OWNERS ON HOW THE PLANTS
ON THEIR PROPERTIES SHOULD LOOK. IT
SEEMS TO ME THAT SOME LAWS SHOULD NOT
EVEN BE ENFORCEABLE AS THE UNITED STATES
OF AMERICA ALREADY RULED THAT ANYONE IS
ALLOWED TO LET ANY PLANTS NOT CONSIDERED
DANGEROUS OR ILLEGAL FLOURISH IN ITS
NATURAL HABITAT. THE TRIBUNAL RULED ON
THIS MATTER YEARS AGO BUT SOME JUDICIAL
DISTRICTS DO NOT SEEM TO BE AWARE OF IT
(I CAN'T GIVE YOU ALL THE DETAILS BUT A
LAWYER SHOULD KNOW ABOUT THE CASE I AM
TRYING TO REFER YOU TO ) ...
COULD YOU PLEASE LET ME KNOW IF I AM
MISTAKEN? WERE YOU AWARE
OF THE FEDERAL LAW WHEN YOUR CODE WAS
ENACTED? IF SO, COULD YOU EXPLAIN TO ME
HOW IT COULD STILL BE ENFORCEABLE?
IF IT IS ALL THE RESULT OF AN OVERSIGHT,
COULD YOU PLEASE INFORM THE PERSONS
INVOLVED WITH THE COMPLAINTS AND ADAPT
YOUR LAWS IN CONSEQUENCE.

YOURS VERY TRULY,
JACQUES ROY



ON TUE, DEC 13, 2016 AT 8:23 AM,
DAMMANN, JENNIFER
WROTE:
> MR. ROY,
>
> THANK YOU FOR YOUR RESPONSE. I
INSPECTED THE PROPERTY YESTERDAY,
(PLEASE SEE ATTACHED PHOTO'S). THERE ARE
SEVERAL AREAS THAT ARE OVER THE 18"
ALLOWED BY CODE. MOST OF THE GRASS/WEEDS
HAVE FALLEN DOWN DUE TO THE RECENT COLD
WEATHER WE HAVE EXPERIENCED.
>
> IS THERE ANYONE THAT YOU CAN SEND TO
THE PROPERTY, BEING YOU ARE OUT OF THE
COUNTRY, TO WEED EAT THE AREAS AT ARE
ABOVE THE 18"? PLEASE ADVISE.
>
> I DID RECEIVE ANOTHER COMPLAINT IN
REGARDS TO THE PROPERTY, AS TO WHY WE
ARE CORRESPONDING AT THIS TIME.
>
> PLEASE ADVISE AS TO WHEN YOU CAN HAVE
THE PROPERTY INTO COMPLIANCE, OTHERWISE
I WILL HAVE TO PROCEED WITH ANOTHER
NOTICE OF VIOLATION.
>
> THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME, AND I LOOK
FORWARD TO HEARING BACK FROM YOU SOON.
>
> REGARDS,
> JENNIFER DAMMANN
> HIGHLANDS COUNTY CODE ENFORCEMENT
OFFICIAL
> (863) 402-6641 PHONE
> (863) 402-6651 FAX
> WWW.HCBCC.NET
> JDAMMANN@HCBCC.ORG
> LEGAL NOTICE REGARDING EMAIL
> SENATE BILL 80 - EFFECTIVE JULY 1,
2006 UNDER FLORIDA LAW, EMAIL
> ADDRESSES ARE PUBLIC RECORDS. IF YOU
DO NOT WANT YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS RELEASED
IN RESPONSE TO A PUBLIC-RECORDS REQUEST,
DO NOT SEND ELECTRONIC EMAIL TO THIS
ENTITY. INSTEAD, CONTACT THIS OFFICE BY
PHONE OR IN WRITING.
>
>
>
> -----ORIGINAL MESSAGE-----
> FROM: JACQUES ROY
[MAILTO:JACQUES.PIERRE.ROY@GMAIL.COM]
> SENT: WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 7, 2016 8:34
AM
> TO: DAMMANN, JENNIFER

> SUBJECT: RE: 6002 APPLE ROAD
>
> I HAD BEEN INFORMED OF HIGH WEED LAST
SPRING AND TOOK CARE OF IT. SOMEONE CAME
TO CHECK AND IT HAD BEEN JUDGED
SATISFACTORY.
> THERE WAS A NEW COMPLAINT LAST
SEPTEMBER AND I DROVE ALL THE WAY BACK
THERE FROM CANADA TO CUT AND/OR PULL THE
WEEDS TO CODE. I FELT THAT IT WAS
SIMILAR TO WHAT HAD BEEN DONE LAST
SPRING AND CAME BACK TO CANADA. I AM
TRUSTING THAT CODE ENF. CAME TO CHECK
THE WORK DONE AND THAT SOME PICTURES
WERE TAKEN...
> I AM SORRY IF SOMEONE IN THE VICINITY
IS STILL UNSATISFIED AND WOULD
APPRECIATE IT IF YOU COULD SEND ME YOUR
PICTURES ON EMAIL AS I AM SURPRISED TO
FIND OUT THAT WEEDS AND GRASS GREW BACK
SO MUCH DURING THE LAST COUPLE OF
MONTHS!
> I MUST ALSO ASK YOU TO CONSIDER THAT
SUCH COMPLAINTS MIGHT BE A SIGN OF
SOMETHING ELSE AS I CANNOT BELIEVE THAT
YOU HAD SO MANY COMPLAINTS ON THIS
PROPERTY FOR SUCH MATTER BEFORE. SOMEONE
MUST BE TRYING TO DISCOURAGE ME; I FEEL
THAT I AM VICTIM OF SOME KIND OF
HARASSMENT! COULD YOU POSSIBLY ACT IN
CONSEQUENCE?
>
>
> ON THU, DEC 1, 2016 AT 11:21 AM,
DAMMANN, JENNIFER
WROTE:
>> MR. ROY,
>>
>> AS YOU ARE AWARE, CODE ENFORCEMENT
HAS AN OPEN COMPLAINT AT THE ABOVE
>> REFERENCED ADDRESS FOR HIGH GRASS AND
WEEDS OVER 18”. I WAS BY THE
>> PROPERTY YESTERDAY, AND NOTICED THAT
THE PROPERTY IS STILL IN
>> VIOLATION OF HIGH GRASS/WEEDS.
>>
>> WHEN WOULD YOU BE ABLE TO MAINTAIN
THE ENTIRE PROPERTY, TAKING ALL
>> GRASS AND WEEDS BELOW 18”? I WOULD
LIKE TO SCHEDULE ANOTHER
>> INSPECTION OF THE PROPERTY IN THE
NEXT COUPLE OF WEEKS. PLEASE
>> ADVISE AS TO WHEN THIS PROJECT WILL
BE COMPLETED SO THAT I MAY DO SO.
>> AFTER THIS TIME FRAME, IF THE
PROPERTY IS NOT BROUGHT INTO
>> COMPLIANCE, CODE ENFORCEMENT WILL
ISSUE A NOTICE OF VIOLATION TO YOU.
>> I WANTED TO REACH OUT TO YOU AS YOU
HAD COMPLIED THE PROPERTY BEFORE, BACK
IN APRIL.
>>
>> I LOOK FORWARD TO HEARING FROM YOU
SOON.
>>
>> JENNIFER DAMMANN
>> HIGHLANDS COUNTY CODE ENFORCEMENT
OFFICIAL
>> (863) 402-6641 PHONE
>> (863) 402-6651 FAX
>> WWW.HCBCC.NET
>> JDAMMANN@HCBCC.ORG
>> LEGAL NOTICE REGARDING EMAIL
>> SENATE BILL 80 - EFFECTIVE JULY 1,
2006 UNDER FLORIDA LAW, EMAIL
>> ADDRESSES ARE PUBLIC RECORDS. IF YOU
DO NOT WANT YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS
>> RELEASED IN RESPONSE TO A
PUBLIC-RECORDS REQUEST, DO NOT SEND
>> ELECTRONIC EMAIL TO THIS ENTITY.
INSTEAD, CONTACT THIS OFFICE BY
>> PHONE OR IN WRITING.
>>
>>
>>
>>

03-28-201710:58 AMUPDATE/NOTES3-28-2017 RESPONDENT IS REQUESTING A
REHEARING. SENT EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE
REQUESTING THIS. WILL TAKE EXHIBIT
PACKAGE TO THE SM ALONG W/ NEW
CORRESPONDENCE FOR HER DETERMINATION.
JD 1 HOUR
03-14-201711:25 AMUPDATE/NOTESTHIS MATTER CAME BEFORE THE SPECIAL
MAGISTRATE ON A VIOLATION OF SECTIONS
5.6-3 (NUISANCE PROHIBITED) AND 5.6-2(1)
(HIGH GRASS/WEEDS) OF THE CODE OF
ORDINANCES, HIGHLANDS COUNTY, FLORIDA.
THE RESPONDENTS WERE NOT IN ATTENDANCE.
THE PETITIONER, HIGHLANDS COUNTY, WAS
REPRESENTED BY CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL
JENNIFER DAMMANN. THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE
FOUND THAT PROPER NOTICE OF THE
VIOLATIONS HAD BEEN PROVIDED TO THE
RESPONDENTS, THAT THE RESPONDENTS HAD
BEEN GIVEN A REASONABLE TIME TO CORRECT
THE VIOLATIONS, THAT THE VIOLATIONS
CONTINUED BEYOND THE TIME SPECIFIED FOR
CORRECTION, AND THAT PROPER NOTICE OF
THE HEARING WAS PROVIDED TO THE
RESPONDENTS. THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE
FOUND THAT BY FAILING TO APPEAR AT THE
HEARING, THE RESPONDENTS HAD ADMITTED
THE VIOLATIONS AND WAIVED THEIR RIGHTS
TO A HEARING. THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE
ADMITTED ALL EXHIBITS INTO EVIDENCE.
FOLLOWING PETITIONER’S REQUEST, THE
SPECIAL MAGISTRATE ORDERED THE
PETITIONER TO HAVE THE VIOLATIONS
CORRECTED BY W.H. POLLARD AND THE
RESPONDENTS TO REIMBURSE THE PETITIONER
FOR THE CORRECTION OF THE VIOLATIONS AT
THE BID PRICE OF $325.00. THE SPECIAL
MAGISTRATE ORDERED THE RESPONDENTS PAY
TO THE PETITIONER A FINE OF $50.00, THE
INVESTIGATION COST OF $95.32, THE
PROSECUTION COST OF $461.94, THE
RECORDING COSTS OF $48.50, AND THE
ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING FEE OF $125.00.
THE TOTAL LIEN AMOUNT OWED BY THE
RESPONDENTS TO BE PAID TO THE PETITIONER
IS $1,105.76. JAM
03-10-201702:09 PMUPDATE/NOTESADDED FINE ON INT
START DATE: 03/10/17 FINE AMT: 0.54
03-10-201702:08 PMUPDATE/NOTESLIEN RECORDED 03/10/17 FOR 1,105.76
BOOK 2570 PAGE 288
03-10-201708:25 AMOFFICIAL FORMMAIL AFFID. PRINTED BY JDAMMANN
03-09-201701:32 PMCOURT APPEARANCETHIS MATTER CAME BEFORE THE SPECIAL
MAGISTRATE ON A VIOLATION OF SECTIONS
5.6-3 (NUISANCE PROHIBITED) AND 5.6-2(1)
(HIGH GRASS/WEEDS) OF THE CODE OF
ORDINANCES, HIGHLANDS COUNTY, FLORIDA.
THE RESPONDENTS WERE NOT IN ATTENDANCE.
THE PETITIONER, HIGHLANDS COUNTY, WAS
REPRESENTED BY CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL
JENNIFER DAMMANN. THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE
FOUND THAT PROPER NOTICE OF THE
VIOLATIONS HAD BEEN PROVIDED TO THE
RESPONDENTS, THAT THE RESPONDENTS HAD
BEEN GIVEN A REASONABLE TIME TO CORRECT
THE VIOLATIONS, THAT THE VIOLATIONS
CONTINUED BEYOND THE TIME SPECIFIED FOR
CORRECTION, AND THAT PROPER NOTICE OF
THE HEARING WAS PROVIDED TO THE
RESPONDENTS. THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE
FOUND THAT BY FAILING TO APPEAR AT THE
HEARING, THE RESPONDENTS HAD ADMITTED
THE VIOLATIONS AND WAIVED THEIR RIGHTS
TO A HEARING. THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE
ADMITTED ALL EXHIBITS INTO EVIDENCE.
FOLLOWING PETITIONER’S REQUEST, THE
SPECIAL MAGISTRATE ORDERED THE
PETITIONER TO HAVE THE VIOLATIONS
CORRECTED BY W.H. POLLARD AND THE
RESPONDENTS TO REIMBURSE THE PETITIONER
FOR THE CORRECTION OF THE VIOLATIONS AT
THE BID PRICE OF $325.00. THE SPECIAL
MAGISTRATE ORDERED THE RESPONDENTS PAY
TO THE PETITIONER A FINE OF $50.00, THE
INVESTIGATION COST OF $95.32, THE
PROSECUTION COST OF $461.94, THE
RECORDING COSTS OF $48.50, AND THE
ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING FEE OF $125.00.
THE TOTAL LIEN AMOUNT OWED BY THE
RESPONDENTS TO BE PAID TO THE PETITIONER
IS $1,105.76. JAM
03-06-201711:35 AMCHECK FOR COMPLIANCE3-6-2017 PROPERTY IS NOT IN COMPLIANCE.
PROCEEDING W/ CASE JD & BSS 1 HOUR
02-24-201711:42 AMREINSPECTIONMET W/ MR. POLLARD TO SHOW HIM WHAT
STAYS (TREES, MISC. PLANTS) AND WHAT
GOES. THERE ARE TWO EVASIVE PLANTS,
BRAZILLIAN PEPPER PLANTS, WHICH WILL
HAVE TO BE REMOVED. JD 1 HOUR
02-23-201710:36 AMUPDATE/NOTES2-23-2017 RECEIVED EMAIL FROM MR. ROY,
REQUESTING ADDITIONAL TIME. HE IS NOT
HAPPY. (PRINTED LONG EMAIL FOR FILE).
RESPONDED TO MR. ROY INFORMING HIM THAT
AMPLE TIME WAS GIVEN, AND COURTESY PHONE
CALLS AND EMAILS WERE MADE IN 2016 PRIOR
TO WRITING THE NOV ON JANUUARY 6, 2017.
MOVING FORWARD WITH PUBLIC HEARING. JD
1.5 HOUR
02-22-201711:22 AMUPDATE/NOTES2-22-2017 PHONED MR. ROY BACK AFTER HE
LEFT VOICE MAIL MESSAGE (707-874-3100).
HE IS VERY ARGUMENTATIVE THAT HE THINKS
HE ONLY HAS TO MAINTAIN THE PROPERTY
TWICE A YEAR. INFORMED HIM THAT NO, HE
NEEDS TO CONTINUE TO MAINTAINT THE
PROPERTY. HE STATED THAT HE WAS THERE AT
THE PROPERTY IN SEPTEMBER AND CUT
EVERYTHING BACK, CE POINTED OUT THAT IN
DECEMBER AN EMAIL WAS FORWARDED TO HIM
THAT OUT OF COURTESY CE INFORMED HIM
THAT THE GRASS AND WEEDS WERE STILL VERY
HIGH. AFTER THAT CE INSPECTED THE
PROPERTY AND WROTE THE NOV ON 1-6-2017,
MAILING CERT & REG. MAIL ON THE 9TH AS
WELL AS SCANNING AND SENDING VIA EMAIL,
WHICH HE STATED THAT HE RECEIVED. CE
INFORMED HIM THAT WE ARE MOVING FORWARD
WITH THE PUBLIC HEARING, AND THAT WE
HAVE ALREADY HAVE COST OF A TITLE SEARCH
AND THAT HE HAD PLENTY OF TIME TO
COMPLY. HE STATED THAT HE WOULD NOT BE
ABLE TO ATTEND THE PUBLIC HEARING, BUT
WOULD SEND AN EMAIL THAT HE WOULD LIKE
TO BE GIVEN TO THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE.
VERY LENGTHY CALL FOR CE JD & BSS AS HE
WAS REFERING BACK TO A PREVIOUS CASE
OVER AND OVER FROM IN THE SPRING. JD &
BSS 30 MIN
02-14-201712:01 PMUPDATE/NOTES02-14-17 NEXT DOOR NEIGHBOR JAMES
WIGGINS 772-913-0287 6006 APPLE ROAD,
SHERRIE WIGGINS CALLED AND WANTED TO
KNOW INFORMATION REGARDING THE HEARING /
HE STATED THE OWNER PITCHES A TENT HAS
NO IDEA WHERE HE USES THE BATHROOM AND
HE WOULD LOVE TO SEE THE PROPERTY
REMOVED / I EXPLAINED THAT WE CAN NOT
CONDEMNED UNLESS THERE IS STRUCTURAL
DAMAGE /AH 30 MIN
02-09-201711:21 AMUPDATE/NOTES2/9/17 RECORDED NON BK 2565 PG 1095. JAM
02-06-201710:46 AMCHECK FOR COMPLIANCE2-6-2017 PROPERTY IS NOT IN COMPLIANCE.
CLERK TO ORDER TITLE SEARCH AND PREPARE
NON , AND REQUEST FOR BID. JD 1 HOUR
01-09-201709:35 AMMAKE VIOLATIONMAKEVIO RECORDED JDAMMANN
01-06-201702:59 PMREINSPECTION1-6-2017 POSTED NOV 3255 TO JACQUES ROY
AND JACQUES ROY REVOCABLE TRUST FOR
5.6-3, 5.6-2(1) NUISANCE HIGH
GRASS/WEEDS. GAVE UNTIL 2-5-2017 TO
COMPLY / 1-6-2017 POSTED NOH FOR
3-9-2017. / 1-9-2017 MAILED CERT &
REGULAR MAIL / 1-12-2017 POSTED TO CE
BOARD. JD 2 HOUR
12-13-201611:19 AMUPDATE/NOTES12-13-2016 MR. ROY RESPONDED TO MY
EMAIL, WANTING PICTURES ETC. OF THE
PROPERTY. EMAILED PICTURES TO MR. ROY
TODAY ALONG WITH AN INQUIRY AS TO WHEN
HE WOULD BE ABLE TO HIRE SOMEONE TO WEED
EAT THE PROPERTY AS MOST OF THE GRASS
HAS FALLEN DOWN. JD 30 MIN
12-01-201611:22 AMUPDATE/NOTES12-1-2016 SENT EMAIL TO MR. ROY
(JACQUES.PIERRE.ROY@GMAIL.COM) ASKING
HIM WHEN THE PROPERTY WOULD BE BROUGHT
INTO COMPLIANCE. INFORMED HIM THAT CODE
WOULD BE THERE IN A COUPLE OF WEEKS, AND
IF THE GRASS/WEEDS WERE NOT UNDER 18"
OVER THE ENTIRE PROPERTY, CE WOULD BE
ISSUING A NOV. EMAILED AS A COURTESY, HE
COMPLIED THIS PROPERTY EARLIER IN THE
YEAR. JD 30 MIN
10-20-201601:31 PMINITIAL INSPECTION10-20-2016 NEED TO REVIEW CASE W/
SUPERVIOSR AS THIS STRUCTURE IS
UNFINISHED. JD 30 MIN
10-10-201604:12 PMUPDATE/NOTESCALLER WANTED STATUS UPDATE. JAM

09-21-201611:06 AMUPDATE/NOTES9-21-16 CALLED 707-874-3100 A GIRL NAMED
MERELL ANSWERED THE PHONE AND INFORMED
CE THAT MR. ROY WAS NOT WITH HER AT HER
LOCATION, WOULD GIVE HIM A MESSAGE. SHE
ALSO PROVIDED TO CE ANOTHER NUMBER
819-357-7711. SPOKE W/ MR. ROY HE SAID
HE WOULD NEED A COUPLE OF WEEKS, GAVE
UNTIL 10-12-2016 TO COMPLY. ALSO
PROVIDED CE PHONE NUMBER TO STAY INTO
CONTACT. JD 30 MIN
09-15-201610:18 AMUPDATE/NOTES9-15-16 MOVED FROM NORTH TO WEST AREA.
BSS
09-02-201609:02 AMCREATE COMPLAINTCOMPLAINT RECORDED BY JMCCOY
Copyright © 2008 – THE PLUS SERIES ® – All Rights Reserved