-     My Account  
   

Log in is not required to search. In the red banner above select: I Want To > Search > Permits

Code Enforcement Detail
Code Enforcement Detail
Case Number CE14020010 complainant  
Case Date 02-04-2014 address  
Origination PHONE - TELEPHONE CALL RECEIVED Status C - CLOSED
Operator tseachor Officer SOUTH
Fines Balance $0.00
Lien Balance $0.00
Total Balance $0.00
Property On Case
STRAP NBR C-29-35-31-060-0000-0710 Owner WATSON THOMAS G + SUSAN
Unit   Owner Address 658 RACOON LN
Property Address 658 RACOON LN City/State/Zip LORIDA FL 33857
City/State/Zip LORIDA FL 33857 Phone  
Case Description
NO PERMIT PULLED FOR BOAT DOCK.
Complaint Code(s)
1: NO BUILDING PERMIT
Inspections/Events Detail
DATETIMEINSPECTION / EVENT TYPEINSTRUCTIONS / COMMENTS
04-03-201902:26 PMUPDATE/NOTES4/3/19 FILE SENT TO RETENTION 6/1/19.
TSP
03-07-201412:25 PMOFFICIAL FORMHOWARD-A.O.C. PRINTED BY HOSTLUND
03-07-201412:09 PMCLOSE COMPLAINTCASE CLOSED BY HOSTLUND
03-07-201412:09 PMREINSPECTIONINSPECTION TODAY FOUND THAT THE DOCK HAS
BEEN RESIZED AS NECESSARY. AM CLOSING
CASE. MR WATSON HAS AN ACTIVE BUILDING
PERMIT AND NEEDS TO OBTAIN A FINAL
INSPECTION WHEN HE IS COMPLETED WITH ALL
WORK, IN COMPLIANCE FOR SETBACK
ISSUES/HO 30
03-05-201412:06 PMUPDATE/NOTESMR WATSON HAS CALLED AND STATED HE HAS
COMPLETED ALL RESIZING AS REQUIRED.
ADVISED THAT I WOULD VISIT HIS PROPERTY
SOON/HO
03-05-201410:06 AMOFFICIAL FORMHOWARD-A.O.NC PRINTED BY HOSTLUND
03-04-201411:32 AMREINSPECTIONMR WATSON HAS OBTAINED PERMITS TO RESIZE
THE DOCK TO MEET PROPER SETBACKS. THE
NEW DOCK HAS BEEN RESIZED TO SIDE
PROPERTY LINES SO THAT THE SETBACK IS 25
PLUS FEET PER THE DOCK POLICY..THE
FRONTAGE OF THE DOCK (APRX 1/2) HAS HAD
RESIZED TO LESS THAN FIVE FEET FROM THE
SEA WALL AND THE MR WATSON IS STILL
FINISHING THE PROJECT TO COMPLETE THE
TASK SO THAT ALL OF THE DOCK IS LESS
THAN FIVE FEET FROM THE SEAWALL. ALL OF
THE DECKBOARDS HAVE BEEN REMOVED TO LESS
THAN FIVE FEET AND THER ARE BOTH NEW AND
EXISTING POSTS TO SUPPORT THE NEW
CONSTRUCTION INDICATING THAT WHEN
FINISHED THE DOCK WILL BE IN COMPLIANCE.
STILL NEEDED TO BE COMPLETED IS THE
REMOVAL OF EXISTING POSTS WHERE THE
OVERSIZED DOCK DECKING HAS BEEN REMOVED
TO COMPLETE THE RESIZING. PER
DISCUSSION WTH MR WATSON AT HIS PLACE OF
BUSINESS HE ADVISED ALTHOUGH HIS PERMIT
IS GHOOD FOR A FEW MONTHS THAT ALL WORK
WILL BE COMPLETED WITHIN ONE WEEK -
WEATHER PERMITTING.. I ADVISED MR
WATSON THAT I NEEDED TO DISCUSS PROGRESS
WITH STAFF AS IT APPEARS THE MAORITY OF
WORK (75%) HAS BEEN DONE. ALSO
INDICASTED THAT EVEN THOUGH A PERMIT MAY
BE GOOD FOR SIX MONTHS, THE CODE
VIOLATION NEEDS TO BE CORRECTED, WITHIN
REASON, POSSIBLY ONE WEEK OR SO/HO 60
03-04-201410:29 AMOFFICIAL FORMHOWARD-A.O.C. PRINTED BY HOSTLUND
03-04-201408:14 AMUPDATE/NOTESSPOKE W/LINDA - ADVISED THAT MR WATSON
HAS OBTAINED A PERMIT AND TO INFORM HER
OF THE PHONE CALL STAFF RECEIVED FROM
MR
WATSON INDICATING THAT THE OLD DOCK
REMOVAL HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND THE
RESIZE OF THE NEW DOCK ALMOST DONE. I
ADVISED THAT I HAVE A SCHEDULED
INSPECTION TODAY AND WANTED TO CLARIFY
THAT SHOULD WORK NOT YET BE FULLY
COMPLETED TO RESIZE DOCK PURSUANT TO
SUBMITTED PERMIT DRAWINGS WHAT
DIRECTION
SHOULD I TAKE. SHE ADVISED IF HE IS IN
PROGRESS OF COMPLETING THE WORK HE
SHOULD BE ENTITLED TO A SMALL AMOUNT OF
TIME TO COMPLETE WORK AS IT SHOULD BE
THE SAME
PROCESS WE UTILIZE WHEN A PERSON
APPLIES
FOR A VARIENCE, HOWEVER THIS SHOULD NOT
BE
LENGTHLY- POSSIBLY A WEEK OR SO. HO 5
03-04-201408:13 AMUPDATE/NOTESCALLED MR WATSON TO ADVISE THAT I WOULD
BE VISITING HIS PROP[ERTY THIM MORNING
AND LEFT CALL BACK NUMBER FOR HIM TO
PLEASE CALL/HO
02-11-201410:38 AMUPDATE/NOTESPERMIT ISSUED TO OWNER 14020101.
02-07-201412:03 PMUPDATE/NOTESRETURNED CALL TO MR WATSON HE WANTED
CLARIFICATION ABLOUT REMOIVAL OF OLD
DOCK AND STATED THAT IN THE PAST THE
BLDG INSPECTOR WEANTED THE OLD DOCK TO
REMAIN TO SHOW PROOF THAT HE WAS ONLY
REPLACING THE OLD DOCK I ADVISED THAT
THE OLD DOCK NEEDS TO BE REMOVED IN
CLUDING THE POSTS HE BELIEVED HE WOULKD
COMPLY OF OTHER NOTE FOR CE 14020010 NO
PERMITS AND SIZE OF DOCK HE BELIEVES
THAT THE DOCK ONLY ENTENDS INTO THE
WATER 5 FT 2 INCH AND HE WILL OBTAIN ALL
REQUIRED PERMITS TO ENSURE DOCK MEETS
APPROPRIATE SIZE, HE QUESTIONED THE 2
INCHES I ADVISED THAT I WOULD HAVE TO
WALK PROPERTY AND MEASURE DOCK AFTER IT
IS RESIZED HAND TO TAKE PICTURES HE WAS
OK/HO 15
02-07-201412:02 PMUPDATE/NOTES 
02-04-201401:50 PMOFFICIAL FORMTED-A.O.P. PRINTED BY HOSTLUND
02-04-201401:50 PMOFFICIAL FORMHOWARD-A.O.P. PRINTED BY HOSTLUND
02-04-201401:48 PMINITIAL INSPECTIONPOSTED W/C 8878 FOR 12.03.101 PERMIT
REQD AND 12.05.310 BOAT DOCK NOT TO
CODE, COMPLY BY 02 28 14 MAIL REG MAIL
02/06/14 ANS CERT MAIL 02 05 14 TO OWNER
AND ATT OF RECORD. POST CEB 02 07 14.
PER GENERO AND CONVERSATIONS W/BLDG DEPT
CAROL THERE ARE NO PERMITS FOR THIS DOCK
WHICH WAS BUILT ATOP OLDER DELIPATED
DOCK TO COMPLY OBTAINI PEMIT AND RESIZE
TO MEET CODE. ALSO NOTE HAD DEPUTY WARD
ON SITE DUE TO PRIOR NEIGHBORHOOD
DISPUTE NO PROBLEM HO 60
02-04-201410:55 AMCREATE COMPLAINTCOMPLAINT RECORDED BY TSEACHOR
Copyright © 2008 – THE PLUS SERIES ® – All Rights Reserved