-     My Account  
   

Log in is not required to search. In the red banner above select: I Want To > Search > Permits

Code Enforcement Detail
Code Enforcement Detail
Case Number CE09020010 complainant  
Case Date 02-03-2009 address  
Origination PHONE - TELEPHONE CALL RECEIVED Status C - CLOSED
Operator ahartsei Officer NORTH
Fines Balance $0.00
Lien Balance $0.00
Total Balance $0.00
Property On Case
STRAP NBR C-21-33-28-010-0180-0042 Owner BALDRIDGE EDWARD + AUDREY Y
Unit   Owner Address 1221 PAULK ST
Property Address 1218 PAULK ST City/State/Zip AVON PARK FL 33825
City/State/Zip AVON PARK FL 33825 Phone  
Case Description
PAULK STREET -JUNK LAWN MOWER MAN
Violation Code(s)
1: CIV -- CIVIL CITATION
2: INT -- INTEREST ON LIEN
3: SM FINE/LIEN -- SPEC MAGISTRATE DAILY FINE
Notes
2010-06-11 14:43:21BRIAN SMITH 449-0429
Inspections/Events Detail
DATETIMEINSPECTION / EVENT TYPEINSTRUCTIONS / COMMENTS
10-29-201511:05 AMUPDATE/NOTESFILE SENT TO RETENTION ON 9/30/16 BUT
HELD IN THE ENGINEERING STORAGE UNTIL
THEN. TED
01-19-201103:43 PMCLOSE COMPLAINTCASE CLOSED BY BSINGLEY
01-19-201103:43 PMREINSPECTION1-19-11 THE SATISFACTION IS RECORDED,
CLOSING, BSS
11-08-201010:07 AMUPDATE/NOTES11/8/10--MAILED COPY OF SOL TO EDWARD &
AUDREY BALDRIDGE, 1221 PAULK ST., AVON
PARK, FL 33825 REGULAR MAIL. TED
11-08-201010:02 AMUPDATE/NOTES11/8/10--RECORDED SOL, FILED 11/8/10,
BOOK 2260, PAGES 813-814. TED
10-29-201009:50 AMUPDATE/NOTESIN COMPLIANCE SM FINE/LIEN
10-29-201009:48 AMCHECK FOR COMPLIANCE10-29-10 - THE MOWERS AND MISC. ITEMS
WERE REMOVED FROM THE PROPERTY. CALL
TED TO COMPLETE A SATISFACTION OF LIEN
ON THE PROPERTY FOR MR. HELMS TO
APPROVE.
LC/BEV
15 MINS.
10-29-201009:42 AMOFFICIAL FORMBEVERLY-A.O.C. PRINTED BY BSINGLEY
10-27-201009:43 AMUPDATE/NOTES10-27-10 - MS. SMITH AND MS. BALDRIDGE
CAME INTO THE OFFICE AND SHOWED PICTURES
SHOWING THE PROPERTY IS CLEANED UP. I
TOLD THEM THAT WE WILL BE OUT NEXT WEEK
TO VERIFY COMPLAINCE. MS. SMITH ASKED
THAT WE CALLED BEFORE INSPECTING THE
PROPERTY. MS. SMITH #443-0911 AND MS.
BALDRIDGE #453-8896.
LC 30 MINS.
09-08-201003:45 PMUPDATE/NOTESADDED FINE ON SM FINE/LIEN
START DATE: 11/02/10 FINE AMT: 100.00
08-20-201011:18 AMUPDATE/NOTESIN COMPLIANCE INT
COMPLIANCE DATE WAS : 08/19/10
08-19-201003:30 PMUPDATE/NOTESFINE SETTLED INT
SETTLE DT: 08/19/10 SETTLE AMT:
08-19-201002:45 PMFINE/LIEN PAYMENTLIEN PAYMENT
PAYMENT DATE: 08/19/2010
PAYMENT AMOUNT: $1,573.09
08-19-201002:45 PMFINE/LIEN PAYMENTFINE PAYMENT: INT
PAYMENT DATE: 08/19/2010
PAYMENT AMOUNT: $1.55
08-16-201010:25 AMUPDATE/NOTESMAILED COPY OF AMENDED ORDER TO EDWARD &
AUDREY BALDRIDGE BOTH REGULAR &
CERTIFIED MAIL AND A COPY WAS MAILED TO
PARKE SUTHERLAND -- 8/16/10. TED
08-16-201009:52 AMUPDATE/NOTESADDED FINE ON INT
START DATE: 08/17/10 FINE AMT: 0.78
08-16-201009:29 AMUPDATE/NOTESLIEN RECORDED 08/17/10 FOR 1,573.09
BOOK 2250 PAGE 165-168
08-16-201009:22 AMUPDATE/NOTESRECORDED AMENDED ORDER, FILED 8/16/10,
BOOK 2250, PAGES 165-168. TED
08-12-201001:19 PMCOURT APPEARANCETHIS MATTER CAME BEFORE THE SPECIAL
MAGISTRATE ON A VIOLATION OF SECTION
5-17 (UNAUTHORIZED DUMPING OR
ACCUMULATION RESTRICTED) OF THE CODE OF
ORDINANCES, HIGHLANDS COUNTY, FLORIDA,
AS A PENALTY HEARING. THE SPECIAL
MAGISTRATE TABLED THE HEARING OF THE
CASE UNTIL LATER IN THE PUBLIC HEARING
AND THEN REOPENED THE HEARING OF THE
CASE. THE RESPONDENT, MR. EDWARD
BALDRIDGE, WAS IN ATTENDANCE AND WAS
REPRESENTED BY ATTORNEY C. PARKE
SUTHERLAND. THE PETITIONER, HIGHLANDS
COUNTY, WAS REPRESENTED BY ATTORNEY
ELIZABETH LENIHAN. TESTIMONY WAS HEARD
FROM MR. EDWARD BALDRIDGE. ATTORNEY
ELIZABETH LENIHAN SUBMITTED AN AMENDED
ORDER DATED AUGUST 12, 2010, REPLACING
THE ORDER DATED AUGUST 9, 2010, BY THE
SPECIAL MAGISTRATE. THE SPECIAL
MAGISTRATE ENTERED THE AMENDED ORDER.
THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE ORDERED THE
RESPONDENTS PAY TO THE PETITIONER A FINE
OF $100.00, THE INVESTIGATION COST OF
$18.75, THE PROSECUTION COST OF
$1,300.84, THE RECORDING COSTS OF
$28.50, AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING
FEE OF $125.00. THE TOTAL LIEN AMOUNT
OWED BY THE RESPONDENTS TO BE PAID TO
THE PETITIONER IS $1,573.09. THE
SPECIAL MAGISTRATE ORDERED THE
RESPONDENTS TO BRING PROOF OF COMPLIANCE
TO THE HIGHLANDS COUNTY CODE ENFORCEMENT
DEPARTMENT ON OR BEFORE NOVEMBER 1,
2010. IF THE VIOLATION IS NOT CORRECTED
AND PROOF RECEIVED BY HIGHLANDS COUNTY
BY THAT TIME, A FINE OF $100.00 PER DAY
SHALL ACCRUE FOR EACH DAY THE VIOLATION
CONTINUES AFTER NOVEMBER 1, 2010.
08-09-201007:07 AMUPDATE/NOTES8-9-2010 @ 3:30PM MET WITH ELIZABETH,
ROSS, MYSELF AND CONFERENCE PHONE WITH
PARKE SUTHERLAND REGARDING THE OBJECTION
TO THE COST OF JUSTIFICATION. THERE WAS
AN ERROR ON THE TABLE FOR 3-9-10 SHOWED
8X2=2 HOURS BUT THE TOTAL OF TIME DID
TOTAL 41 HOURS. THE TOTAL HOURS FOR
3-9-10 WA 16 HOURS AND THIS WAS
CORRECTED AND PARKE AGREED. BEV
30 MINS.
08-04-201011:27 AMUPDATE/NOTES8/4/10 -- MR. ED BALDRIDGE CALLED AND
REQUESTED TWO COPIES OF BOTH THE MAY 14,
2010, AND JULY 28, 2010, AUDIO
RECORDINGS OF THE PUBLIC HEARINGS AND
WILL PICK THEM UP
THIS WEEK AT A CHARGE OF $.36 EACH, OR
A
TOTAL OF $1.44. TED
08-02-201002:26 PMUPDATE/NOTES8-2-10 FAXED A COPY OF THE REVIEW OF
TIME AGAIN TO MR. SUTHERLAND'S OFFICE
PER REQUEST AT 2:00PM. CALLED AND SPOKE
TO JOY AND ASKED HER TO MAKE SURE THEY
RECEIVED THE FAX. SHE SAID SHE'S NOT
SURE WHAT SHE DID WITH THE FIRST COPY,
THAT SHE WOULD CHECK THE FAX AND CALL
BACK IF SHE DIDN'T GET IT. BEV
08-02-201002:24 PMUPDATE/NOTES8-2-2010 MR. SUTHERLAND'S OFFICE CALLED
AND SPOKE TO APRIL AND SAID THEY HAVE
MISPLACED THE FAX FOR REVIEW FOR TIME
COULD OUR CE OFFICE SEND THE FAX AGAIN.
BEV
07-30-201002:23 PMUPDATE/NOTES7-30-2010 TED FAXED COPY OF MOTION FOR
MORE TIME TO REVIEW TO PAMELA KARLSON
AND ROSS MACBETH OFFICE AT 19:18PM. BEV
07-30-201002:22 PMUPDATE/NOTES7-30-2010 TED RECEIVED FAX @ 16:38PM.
MR. SUTHERLAND FAXED OVER A REQUEST FOR
RESPONDENT'S MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF
TIME TO REVIEW THE DEPARTMENT'S
DOCUMENTATION OF SUPPORT OF FEES AND
COSTS OF PROSECUTION. BEV
07-29-201002:16 PMUPDATE/NOTES7-29-2010 @ 12:36PM FAXED THE TABLE FOR
TIME OVER TO PARKE SUTHERLANDS OFFICE.
ALSO CALLED JOY AND SPOKE WITH HER TO
MAKE SURE SHE RECEIVED THE FAX, SHE SAID
SHE WOULD CALL IF THEY DIDN'T GET IT.
BEV
07-28-201001:42 PMCOURT APPEARANCETHE RESPONDENT, MR. EDWARD BALDRIDGE,
WAS IN ATTENDANCE AND WAS REPRESENTED BY
ATTORNEY C. PARKE SUTHERLAND. THE
PETITIONER, HIGHLANDS COUNTY, WAS
REPRESENTED BY ATTORNEY J. ROSS MACBETH.
ATTORNEY C. PARKE SUTHERLAND REQUESTED
AND THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE TOOK JUDICIAL
NOTICE FOR HIGHLANDS COUNTY CODE OF
ORDINANCES CHAPTER 2, ARTICLE VI,
DIVISION 5, SECTIONS 2-241 THROUGH
2-247; CHAPTER 5, ARTICLE II, SECTION
5-27; AND CHAPTER 12, ARTICLE 6,
SECTIONS 12.06.103 AND 12.06.105.
ATTORNEY C. PARKE SUTHERLAND BROUGHT UP
A MOTION TO CHALLENGE THE JURISDICTION
OF THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE TO HEAR THIS
CASE BASED UPON HIGHLANDS COUNTY CODE OF
ORDINANCES CHAPTER 2, ARTICLE VI,
DIVISION 5, SECTIONS 2-241 THROUGH 2-247
AND TWO FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL?S
OPINIONS WHICH WERE SUBMITTED TO THE
SPECIAL MAGISTRATE. THE PETITIONER
STATED THAT THIS PUBLIC HEARING WAS NOT
PROCEEDING UNDER HIGHLANDS COUNTY CODE
OF ORDINANCES ARTICLE VI, WHICH IS AN
ALTERNATIVE MEANS OF ENFORCEMENT, BUT
ARTICLE XII CODE ENFORCEMENT, CHAPTER 2,
DIVISIONS 1 THROUGH 5 WHICH GIVE
JURISDICTION TO THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE
TO HEAR THIS CASE. THE SPECIAL
MAGISTRATE DENIED THE MOTION AND FOUND
THAT COUNTY ORDINANCES UNDER ARTICLE XII
GIVES JURISDICTION TO THE SPECIAL
MAGISTRATE TO HEAR THIS CASE. THE
PETITIONER OBJECTED TO THE TESTIMONY OF
LEROY STARLING AND JULIAN MOORE BECAUSE
THE COUNTY DID NOT RECEIVE NOTICE OF
THESE WITNESSES AS REQUIRED BY THE
COUNTY CODE OF ORDINANCES SECTION
3-262(H). THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE
ORDERED THAT THE TESTIMONY WOULD BE
ALLOWED AND SHE WOULD GIVE THE TESTIMONY
THE WEIGHT IT DESERVED. TESTIMONY WAS
HEARD FROM LEROY STARLING, JULIAN MOORE,
EDWARD BALDRIDGE, ROBERT SCHULER, AND
CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER BEVERLY
SINGLEY. RESPONDENT?S EXHIBIT 3 AND
PETITIONER?S EXHIBITS 20, 21, AND 22
WERE ENTERED INTO EVIDENCE AND JUDICIAL
NOTICE WAS TAKEN FOR LAND DEVELOPMENT
REGULATIONS. THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE
ORDERED THAT AFTER SHE GIVES THIS CASE A
FULL REVIEW SHE WOULD MAKE HER RULING
NEXT WEEK. THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE
ORDERED THAT ATTORNEY C. PARKE
SUTHERLAND WILL HAVE UNTIL FRIDAY, JULY
30, 2010, TO INFORM HER OF ANY OBJECTION
OR COMMENT REGARDING THE 41 HOURS THAT
THE CODE ENFORCEMENT DEPARTMENT HAD
EXPENDED IN THIS CASE. THE PUBLIC
HEARING WAS ADJOURNED AT 3:43 P.M. AND
WILL RECONVENE AT A PENALTY HEARING THAT
WILL BE SCHEDULED LATER.
07-27-201012:28 PMUPDATE/NOTES7-27-2010 NO COMPLIANCE, PHOTOS, AND
PREPARED FILE FOR HEARING, MADE COPIES.
BEV
1 HR.
06-04-201010:39 AMUPDATE/NOTESRECORDED ORDER CONTINUING HEARING AND
CONTINUING APPEARANCES UNDER ANY
SUBPOENAS TO JULY 28, 2010, BOOK 2240,
PAGE 1429, FILED 6/4/10. TED
06-03-201003:02 PMUPDATE/NOTESMRS. BALDRDIGE CALLED AND REQUESTED AN
AUDIO COPY ON A CD OF THE PUBLIC HEARING
ON MAY 14, 2010. GLORIA RYBINSKI IN
ADMIN. INSTRUCTED ME TO CHARGE $.47 FOR
THE RECORDING AND NO NEED TO FILL OUT A
FORM FOR THIS REQUEST. MRS. BALDRIDGE
WILL PICK UP THE COPY ON 6/4/10. TED
05-14-201002:11 PMCOURT APPEARANCETHE RESPONDENTS WERE IN ATTENDANCE AND
WERE REPRESENTED BY ATTORNEY C. PARKE
SUTHERLAND. THE PETITIONER, HIGHLANDS
COUNTY, WAS REPRESENTED BY ATTORNEY J.
ROSS MACBETH. THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE
ASKED IF THERE WERE ANY PRELIMINARY
MATTERS TO BE DISCUSSED. MR. SUTHERLAND
BROUGHT UP A MOTION THAT THE CASE SHOULD
BE HEARD IN THE COUNTY COURT AND NOT
BEFORE THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE AS STATED
IN THE FLORIDA STATUTES. THE PETITIONER
STATED THIS PUBLIC HEARING WAS NOT
PROCEEDING UNDER FLORIDA STATUTES BUT
UNDER ARTICLE 12, SECTION 2-340 OF THE
HIGHLANDS COUNTY ORDINANCES WHICH GIVES
JURISDICTION TO THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE
TO HEAR THE CASE. THE SPECIAL
MAGISTRATE DENIED THE MOTION AND FOUND
THAT COUNTY ORDINANCES DO GIVE
JURISDICTION TO THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE
TO HEAR THIS CASE.

THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE CALLED ON BOTH
THE PETITIONER AND THE RESPONDENTS TO
PRESENT THEIR OPENING STATEMENTS. THE
PETITIONER STATED THAT THE RESPONDENTS
HAD RECEIVED A WARNING CITATION ISSUED
UNDER SECTION 5-17 OF THE CODE FOR
ACCUMULATION OF LAWN MOWERS AND OTHER
TYPES OF SOLID WASTE AS WELL AS
INOPERABLE VEHICLES, WHICH ARE
PROHIBITED BY THIS SECTION OF THE CODE.
THE PETITIONER STATED THAT THE
RESPONDENTS ALSO REQUESTED ADDITIONAL
TIME TO CLEAN UP THE PROPERTY. MR.
SUTHERLAND STATED SECTION 5-27 PROVIDES
CERTAIN EXEMPTIONS FROM SECTION 5-17 AND
STATED THE EVIDENCE WILL SHOW THAT THE
PROPERTY WAS EXEMPT DUE TO ITS LAWFUL
USE. THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE ORDERED
THAT THE AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES OF
ESTOPPEL AND LACHES WILL BE EXCLUDED AS
PREVIOUSLY RULED. THE SPECIAL
MAGISTRATE WENT TO EXPLAIN THAT ESTOPPEL
AND LACHES REFER TO WHATEVER THE COUNTY
HAS SAID OR DONE IN THE PAST IN RESPECT
TO THIS CASE AND ANY ARGUMENTS LEADING
TO THIS WOULD BE EXCLUDED. THE SPECIAL
MAGISTRATE FURTHER ORDERED THAT ONLY
ARGUMENTS ESTABLISHING THAT THIS IS A
PROPERLY ZONED ESTABLISHMENT FOR
COMMERCIAL USE INSTEAD OF RESIDENTIAL OR
A MOBILE HOME USE WILL BE PERMITTED.

TESTIMONY WAS HEARD FROM CODE
ENFORCEMENT OFFICER BEVERLY SINGLEY,
ZONING SUPERVISOR LINDA CONRAD, AND
PLANNING SUPERVISOR DON HANNA.
PETITIONER?S EXHIBITS 1-3, 7-11, AND
14-19 AND RESPONDENTS? EXHIBIT 2 WERE
ENTERED INTO EVIDENCE AND JUDICIAL
NOTICE WAS TAKEN OF CODE SECTION
12.05.306.

THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS ADJOURNED AT
11:50 A.M. AND WILL RECONVENE AT A LATER
DATE ONCE A MUTUALLY AGREEABLE TIME HAS
BEEN AGREED UPON AND SCHEDULED BY THE
CODE ENFORCEMENT CLERK. THE SPECIAL
MAGISTRATE RULED THAT ALL SUBPOENAS
WOULD BE CONTINUED UNTIL THE NEXT
HEARING DATE.
05-13-201009:22 AMREINSPECTION5-13-2010 AFFIDAVIT OF NON COMPLIANCE,
ALL ACCUMULATION IS THERE AND SEVERAL
BAGS OF ALUM. CANS IN FRONT AREA BEHIND
FRONT FENCE LINE. BEV
05-13-201009:17 AMOFFICIAL FORMA.O.NC.-BEV PRINTED BY BSINGLEY
05-10-201003:59 PMUPDATE/NOTES5-10-2010 REVIEW OF FILE WITH ROSS,
ELIZABETH, LINDA, APRIL AND BEVERLY AT
ROSS'S OFFICE. 1 HR.
05-06-201004:40 PMUPDATE/NOTESMAILED COPY OF ORDER GRANTING
PETITIONER'S MOTION TO STRIKE
RESPONDENTS' AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES... TO
C. PARKE SUTHERLAND AND ALSO FAXED A
COPY TO C. PARKE SUTHERLAND AND
ELIZABETH LENIHAN. TED
05-06-201004:39 PMUPDATE/NOTESRECORDED ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER'S
MOTION TO STRIKE RESPONDENTS'
AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES, PETITIONER'S
REQUEST TO TAKE JUDICIAL NOTICE OF
HIGHLANDS COUNTY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN,
AND PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF
HEARING TIME, FILED 5/6/10, BOOK 2237,
PAGE 684-685. TED
04-30-201010:58 AMUPDATE/NOTESFAXED RECORDED COPY OF CONTINUATION
ORDER TO MAY 14, 2010 TO PAMELA KARLSON,
C. PARKE SUTHERLAND, ESQ., AND ELIZABETH
LENIHAN, ESQ. ALSO MAILED COPY OF
RECORDED ORDER TO C. PARKE SUTHERLAND,
ESQ. TED
04-30-201010:42 AMUPDATE/NOTESRECORDED SPECIAL MAGISTRATE ORDER
CONTINUING HEARING TO MAY 14, 2010,
FILED 4/30/10, BOOK 2236, PAGE 1415. TED
04-20-201002:13 PMUPDATE/NOTESMAILED NOTICE OF HEARING TO EDWARD &
AUDREY BALDRIDGE FOR MAY 14, 2010 AT
9:00 A.M. BOTH REGULAR AND CERTIFIED
MAIL & ALSO TO C. PARKE SUTHERLAND, ESQ.
TED
04-16-201010:13 AMUPDATE/NOTESRECORDED ORDER CONTINUING HEARING AND
CONTINUING APPEARANCES UNDER ANY
SUBPOENAS FROM APRIL 8, 2010 TO MAY 13,
2010, FILED 4/16/10, BOOK 2234, PAGE
1629. TED
04-09-201009:26 AMUPDATE/NOTES4-9-2010 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE WAS ADDED
TO FILE FROM C. PARKE SUTHERLAND FOR
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE ON BEHALF OF THE
RESPONDENTS.
04-09-201009:24 AMUPDATE/NOTES4-9-2010 NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL AND
SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL ADDED TO FILE.
NANCYE BARBER CORNELIUS WITHDREW FROM
CASE AND NOW C. PARKE SUTHERLAND WILL
TAKE THE FOR RESPONDENTS.
04-08-201012:24 PMCOURT APPEARANCEA STIPULATION WAS ENTERED AND WAS MOVED
TO THE MAY 13, 2010, PUBLIC HEARING.
04-07-201012:50 PMUPDATE/NOTES4-7-2010 @ 3:30PM LIZ, FROM BUD FURR
OFFICE CALLED AND WANTED TO KNOW IF THE
CASE IS CONTINUED. AH
15 MINS.
04-05-201009:19 AMUPDATE/NOTES4-5-2010 ADDED SEVERAL RETURN OF SERVICE
SUBPOENA FOR HEARINGS TO THE FILE; HAZEL
TOWNSEND, GEORGIA TOWNSEND. BEV
04-05-201009:19 AMUPDATE/NOTES4-5-2010 PTITIONER'S SECOND ADMENDED
WITNESSS LIST ADDED TO THE FILE. BEV
04-01-201012:27 PMUPDATE/NOTES04-01-10 RESEARCHED THE CHAIN OF TITLE
AND MADE COPIES AND DELIVERED TO ROSS
OFFICE /4 HOURS /AH
04-01-201012:26 PMUPDATE/NOTES04-01-10 MADE COPIES OF THE FILE WITH
THE NEW CERTIFICATION ON THE COPIES FOR
APRIL'S HEARING AND DELIVERED TO ROSS
OFFICE/2 HOURS/AH
04-01-201012:24 PMUPDATE/NOTES03-31-10 WENT TO NATURAL RESOURCES TO
HAVE MAPS CERTIFIED AND PICK UP MAPS
FOR THIS HEARING AND DELIVER TO ROSS
OFFICE
/60 MINS /AH
03-31-201012:24 PMUPDATE/NOTES03-31-10 ADDED WITNESS LIST TO FILE AND
REVIEWED FILE WITH APRIL,
LINDA, BEVERLY, AND ROSS /1 HOUR /AH
03-31-201009:15 AMUPDATE/NOTES3-31-2010 REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
FROM ROSS MACBETH'S OFFICE ADDED TO THE
FILE. ALSO A PETITIONER'S REQUEST TO
TAKE JUDICIAL NOTICE AND NOTICE OF THAT
REQUEST WAS ADDED TO THE FILE. BEV
03-16-201009:13 AMUPDATE/NOTES3-16-2010 MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT
OF PETITIONER'S MOTION TO STRIKE
RESPONDENTS' AFFIRMATIIVE DENFENSES
ADDED TO THE FILE. BEV
03-11-201012:24 PMCOURT APPEARANCEA JOINT CONTINUANCE WAS FILED FOR THIS
CASE AND THIS CASE WILL BE BROUGHT BACK
FOR A PUBLIC HEARING ON APRIL 8, 2010.
03-10-201011:23 AMOFFICIAL FORMA.O.NC.-CLYDE PRINTED BY CKOMA
03-10-201010:36 AMCHECK FOR COMPLIANCE3-10-2010 AFFIDAVIT OF NON COMPLIANCE
DONE BY CLYDE. BEV
30 MINS.
03-10-201010:35 AMUPDATE/NOTES3-10-2010 RECEIVED A MOTION FOR
CONTINUANCE FROM ATTORNEY TODAY FOR THE
CASE. FAXED TO ELIZABETH OUR ATTORNEY.
BEV
15 MINS.
03-09-201010:49 AMUPDATE/NOTESMAILED COPY OF ORDER FROM SM DATED
3/3/10 TO EDWARD & AUDREY BALDRIDGE AND
NANCYE BARBER CORNELIUS, ESQ. BOTH
CERTIFIED AND REGULAR MAIL. TED
03-09-201010:33 AMUPDATE/NOTESRECEIVED ANOTHER LETTER BY FAX FROM
ATTORNEY, FOR AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES, ON
THE CASE, BEV
03-09-201009:22 AMUPDATE/NOTES3-9-2010 REVEIWED THE CASE WITH STAFF,
ELIZABETH, APRIL, LINDA AND BEVERLY.
CALLED ALL THE WITNESS ON ATTORNEY LIST
THAT WE FOUND TELEPHONE NUMBERS. WORKED
ON QUESTIONS FOR CASE FILE. BEV
8 HOURS
03-09-201009:20 AMUPDATE/NOTES3-9-2010 WITNESS LIST RECEIVED BY MAIL
FROM ATTORNEY. BEV
03-08-201003:24 PMUPDATE/NOTESORDER OF CONTINUANCE RECORDED, FILED
3/8/2010, BOOK 2229, PAGE 1304.
03-08-201009:05 AMUPDATE/NOTES3-8-2010 RECEIVED WITNESS LIST FROM
ATTORNEY FOR CASE BY FAX. BEV
02-26-201008:24 AMREINSPECTION2-26-10 AFFIDAVIT OF HAND DELIVERED
DONE, FOR THE NOTICE OF HEARING TO MR.
BALDRIDGE, RECEIVED HIS SIGNATURE. HE
WAS ON THE PROPERTY. BEV & AH
15 MINS.
02-23-201011:24 AMUPDATE/NOTES2-23-2010 SENT WITNESS LIST TO OWNER AND
ATTORNERY BY CERTIFED AND REGULAR MAIL.
BEV
15 MINS.
02-11-201011:23 AMNOTICE OF HEARING2-11-2010 SPECIAL MAGISTRATE CONTINUED
CASE TO MARCH 11, 2010 PER RESPONDENTS
REQUEST.BEV
02-11-201009:49 AMCOURT APPEARANCEONE OF THE RESPONDENTS, MR. EDWARD
BALDRIDGE, WAS IN ATTENDANCE AND WAS
JOINED BY NANCYE CORNELIUS, ESQ. WHO
SPOKE ON BEHALF OF THE RESPONDENTS.
MS.
CORNELIUS REQUESTED ADDITIONAL TIME IN
WHICH TO BETTER DEFEND THE RESPONDENTS?
CASE AS WELL AS OBTAIN WITNESSES IN THE
RESPONDENTS? DEFENSE AND ASKED FOR A
CONTINUANCE UNTIL THE MARCH 11, 2010
PUBLIC HEARING. THE PETITIONER,
HIGHLANDS COUNTY, WAS REPRESENTED BY
CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER BEVERLY
SINGLEY, WHO TESTIFIED THAT AT A
MEETING
ON JANUARY 25, 2010, SHE INFORMED THE
RESPONDENTS THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE
WOULD
HAVE TO DECIDE IF SHE WANTED TO GRANT
THE CONTINUANCE FOR THE RESPONDENTS.
MS. SINGLEY TESTIFIED IN HIGHLANDS
COUNTY CODE 2-362(K) IT STATES, ??THE
CODE ENFORCEMENT SPECIAL MAGISTRATE MAY
GRANT CONTINUANCES IF A WITNESS CANNOT
BE SERVED WITH A SUBPOENA OR IF A
SUBPOENAED WITNESS FAILS TO APPEAR.?
MS. SINGLEY STATED THE RESPONDENTS ARE
ASKING FOR CONTINUANCE FOR ADDITIONAL
TIME TO SUBPOENA WITNESSES NOT THAT THE
WITNESSES COULD NOT APPEAR AT THIS TIME
OR BE SUBPOENAED AND THE RESPONDENTS
HAD
KNOWN OF THE VIOLATION FOR NINE MONTHS.
MS. SINGLEY ALSO STATED THE RESPONDENTS
PREVIOUSLY REQUESTED ADDITIONAL TIME TO
COME INTO COMPLIANCE AND A CONTINUANCE
WOULD BE INEQUITABLE TO HIGHLANDS
COUNTY
AS THE CODE ENFORCEMENT DEPARTMENT
WOULD
HAVE TO SPEND ADDITIONAL TIME AND MONEY
ON THIS CASE AND WITH THE CURRENT
OVERDUE INSPECTIONS OF OVER 600 CASES
THIS WOULD BE OVER-BURDENSOME. MS.
SINGLEY STATED THE RESPONDENTS HAVE HAD
MORE THAN AMPLE TIME TO SUBPOENA
WITNESSES AND PREPARE THEIR CASE AND
THE
WARNING CITATION WOULD EXPIRE ON MARCH
1, 2010. MS. CORNELIUS STATED HER
OFFICE HAD BEEN RETAINED IN THE MIDDLE
OF JANUARY 2010 AND JUST BECAME AWARE
OF
THE PROBLEM AND HAS NOT HAD SUFFICIENT
TIME TO PREPARE THE RESPONDENTS?
DEFENSE
AND GATHER NECESSARY HISTORICAL
EVIDENCE. MS. SINGLEY STATED THE
RESPONDENTS HAD ASKED FOR A 30 DAY
EXTENSION ON MARCH 27, 2009 AND AGREED
TO BRING THE PROPERTY INTO COMPLIANCE
AND NEEDED THE EXTRA TIME TO BRING IN
DUMPSTERS TO CLEAN UP THE PROPERTY AND
DID NOT CONTEST THE VIOLATIONS AT THAT
TIME. MS. SINGLEY STATED THE
REINSPECTION WAS DONE IN JANUARY 2010
AND THE RESPONDENTS STILL HAD NOT
BROUGHT THE PROPERTY INTO COMPLIANCE.
MS. CORNELIUS STATED SHE WAS NOT
INVOLVED IN THE CASE AT THAT TIME BUT
IS
AWARE THE RESPONDENTS HAD REMOVED
11,000
POUNDS WORTH OF LAWN MOWERS BUT THE
RESPONDENTS WERE NOT AWARE OF THEIR
RIGHTS OR OF THE ISSUES OF THE CASE AT
THAT TIME AND ARE CONTESTING THE
CITATION. MS. CORNELIUS STATED THE
ZONING ON THE PROPERTY IS THE ISSUE AND
THE RESPONDENTS ARE CONTESTING THAT
ISSUE. THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE ASKED
NANCYE CORNELIUS IF THE CASE WAS
CONTINUED TO MARCH 11, 2010 IF SHE
WOULD
AGREE ON BEHALF OF THE RESPONDENTS TO
WAIVE ANY OBJECTION TO THE STATUTE OF
LIMITATIONS ON THE WARNING CITATION AND
MS. CORNELIUS AGREED. THE SPECIAL
MAGISTRATE CONCLUDED THAT THE
RESPONDENTS WERE NOT REQUESTING THE
CONTINUANCE TO COME INTO COMPLIANCE,
BUT
TO GATHER INFORMATION ABOUT THE FACTS
SURROUNDING THE ALLEGATION AND
WITNESSES
TO TESTIFY. MS. SINGLEY REQUESTED IF
THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE GRANTS A
CONTINUATION TO MARCH 11, 2010 THE
RESPONDENTS PAY A FINE OF $100.00 PER
DAY AS LONG AS THE PROPERTY HAS NOT
COME
INTO COMPLIANCE FROM FEBRUARY 11, 2010
TO MARCH 10, 2010. THE SPECIAL
MAGISTRATE ORDERED NO FINE BE IMPOSED
AT
THIS TIME UNTIL A DETERMINATION OF
WHETHER A VIOLATION EXISTS OR NOT HAS
BEEN MADE AND GRANTED A CONTINUANCE TO
MARCH 11, 2010. 30 MINS.
02-10-201011:04 AMOFFICIAL FORMA.O.NC.-BEV PRINTED BY BSINGLEY
02-10-201011:04 AMREINSPECTION2-10-10 NO COMPLIANCE, AFFIDAVIT DONE,
SEVERAL PARTS, LAWN MOWERS, RECYCLING.
BEV & AH
30 MINS.
02-09-201002:30 PMUPDATE/NOTES2-9-2010 PREPARING CASE FOR SM HEARING,
GETTING FILE COPIED, NOTES ADDED,
WRITING CASE NOTES, BEV
45 MINS.
02-09-201011:02 AMUPDATE/NOTES2-9-2010 MAILED WITNESS LIST TO OWNER
AND ATTORNEYS OFFICE TODAY BY CERTIFIED
AND REGULAR MAIL. ALSO FAXED TO
ATTORNEYS OFFICE. BEV
30 MINS.
02-04-201001:07 PMUPDATE/NOTESNOTICE OF APPEARANCE RECEIVED FROM
NANCYE CORNELIUS, COUNSEL FOR
RESPONDENTS, EDWARD & AUDREY BALDRIDGE,
DATED FEBRUARY 4, 2010. TED
02-03-201011:07 AMUPDATE/NOTES2-3-10 HAD MEETING WITH ELIZABETH,
COUNTY ATTORNEY AND STAFF TO PREPARE FOR
HEARING ON 2-11-10. BEV
1 HR.
02-01-201010:47 AMMAKE VIOLATIONMAKEVIO RECORDED BSINGLEY
01-29-201007:35 AMREINSPECTION1-29-2010 POSTED PROPERTY WITH NOTICE OF
HEARING, NO ONE THERE. ALSO MAILED
CERTIFIED AND REGULAR MAIL TO OWNER AND
ATTORNEY. ALSO FAXED COPY OF NOTICE OF
HEARING TO ATTORNEYS OFFICE. BEV
30 MINS.
01-25-201007:36 AMUPDATE/NOTESMEETING REGARDING EDWARD & AUDREY
BALDRIDGE - 1218 PAULK STREET, AVON
PARK, FLORIDA 33825. CE #09020010
JANUARY 25, 2010

MEETING WAS HELD ON JANUARY 25, 2010 AT
1:00 P.M.

PRESENT AT THE MEETING WERE: EDWARD
BALDRIDGE, NANCYE CORNELIUS, ESQ., BUD
FURR, ESQ., LINDA CONRAD, APRIL
HARTSEIL, BEVERLY SINGLEY, AND TED
SEACHORD.

NANCYE CORNELIUS GAVE A WRITTEN REQUEST
FOR AN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING TO
CONTEST
CITATION #005443. BEVERLY SINGLEY HAND
DELIVERED NANCYE CORNELIUS THE CONTEST
FORM AND A COPY OF SECTION 2-345(D) 2
THROUGH 7.

BUD FURR AND NANCYE CORNELIUS,
ATTORNEYS
FOR MR. BALDRIDGE, REQUESTED TO KNOW
WHO
THE INDIVIDUAL WAS THAT CALLED THE
COMPLAINT IN.

BEVERLY SINGLEY AND APRIL HARTSEIL
REPLIED MOST COMPLAINTS ARE GIVEN BY
INDIVIDUALS WHO DO NOT GIVE THEIR NAMES
AND THERE IS NO RECORD AS TO WHO CALLED
IN THIS COMPLAINT.

BUD FURR AND NANCYE CORNELIUS REQUESTED
AS TO WHO TOOK THE CALL AND ENTERED THE
COMPLAINT.

AFTER RESEARCHING THE COMPLAINT
HISTORY,
APRIL HARTSEIL STATED THAT SHE HAD
TAKEN
THE ORIGINAL COMPLAINT CALL ON FEBRUARY
3, 2009 AND ENTERED THE COMPLAINT
HERSELF.

BUD FURR WANTED TO KNOW HOW TO TAKE
CARE
OF THE PROBLEM AND STATED THAT NONE OF
THE NEIGHBORS WERE COMPLAINING OR
ANYONE
ELSE ABOUT THE VIOLATIONS OCCURRING AND
ASKED HOW CAN WE MAKE THIS GO AWAY?

BEVERLY SINGLEY STATED THERE WAS A
COMPLAINT CALLED IN AND CODE
ENFORCEMENT
RESPONDED TO THE COMPLAINT RECEIVED AND
THE VIOLATION STILL EXISTS AND CANNOT
BE
CLOSED UNTIL COMPLIED AND IS CONFIRMED
BY REMOVING LAWN MOWING AND RECYCLING
BUSINESS FROM PROPERTY.

APRIL HARTSEIL STATED CODE ENFORCEMENT
HAS UP TO 800 OPEN CASES AND CODE
ENFORCEMENT RESPONDED TO COMPLAINTS
FROM
A PHONE CALL RECEIVED AND THAT CODE
ENFORCEMENT IS NOT PROACTIVE.

NANCYE CORNELIUS REQUESTED THE REASON
WHY CODE ENFORCEMENT HAD NOT BROUGHT UP
THE ISSUE OF THE LAWN MOWERS WHEN THEY
HAD VISITED THE PROPERTY PREVIOUSLY.

BUD FURR STATED MR. BALDRIDGE HAD
SPOKEN
WITH TOMMY TURNBULL, A PREVIOUS CODE
ENFORCEMENT OFFICER, AND THAT MR.
TURNBULL TOLD MR. BALDRIDGE HE COULD
CONTINUE TO OPERATE HIS BUSINESS AS IT
WAS BECAUSE IT IS GRANDFATHERED.

LINDA CONRAD STATED THE PROPERTY IS
ZONED M1-S AND SECTION 12.06.103 STATES
IF A BUSINESS CHANGES IT IS NO LONGER
GRANDFATHERED IN AND STATED THE
PREVIOUS
OWNER OPERATED A SEPTIC BUSINESS,
ACCORDING TO MR. BALDRIDGE, WHICH IS A
COMPLETELY DIFFERENT TYPE OF BUSINESS
FROM MR. BALDRIDGE?S LAWN MOWER
BUSINESS.

?D. IF ANY SUCH NONCONFORMING USE OF
LAND CEASES FOR ANY REASON FOR A PERIOD
OF MORE THAN 60 CONSECUTIVE DAYS,
EXCEPT
WHERE SUCH USE HAS BEEN SUSPENDED BY
ACT
OF GOD, ANY SUBSEQUENT USE OF THE LAND
SHALL CONFORM TO THE REGULATIONS
SPECIFIED BY THIS CODE FOR THE DISTRICT
IN WHICH IT IS LOCATED, EXCEPT FOR
AGRICULTURAL TYPE AND SEASONAL TYPE
USES. IF USE OF LAND FOR SUCH PURPOSES
CEASES FOR TWO CONSECUTIVE YEARS, THEN
ALL FURTHER USE OF SUCH LAND SHALL BE
CONFORMING.
E. THE NONCONFORMING USE OF LAND
WHICH
IS ACCESSORY OR INCIDENTAL TO THE
NONCONFORMING USE OF A BUILDING OR
STRUCTURE SHALL BE DISCONTINUED ON THE
SAME DATE THE NONCONFORMING USE OF THE
BUILDING OR STRUCTURE IS DISCONTINUED.?

BUD FURR SUGGESTED A ZONING VARIANCE IN
ORDER FOR THE BUSINESS TO CONTINUE AS
IT
IS OR A ZONING CHANGE.

LINDA CONRAD STATED THE PROPERTY WOULD
NOT QUALIFY FOR A VARIANCE DUE TO ITS
NOT PERMITTED USE. THE PROPERTY WOULD
NEED AT LEAST A B-3 ZONING DISTRICT,
AND
MR. BALDRIDGE?S LOT DOES NOT MEET THE
MINIMUM LOT SIZE OF 20,000 AND 100 FEET
OF WIDTH TO APPLY FOR A ZONING CHANGE
AND LAND USE CHANGE.

BUD FURR STATED BECAUSE OF THE ZONING
ISSUE IT SEEMS THAT THE ISSUE WILL
NEVER
BE RESOLVED.

BEVERLY SINGLEY STATED THE PROPERTY IS
ZONED FOR A SINGLE FAMILY HOME AND NOT
A
BUSINESS.

BUD FURR STATED THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED
IN AN AREA SURROUNDED BY MOBILE HOMES
AND WANTED TO KNOW IF MR. BALDRIDGE
WERE
TO PLACE A MOBILE HOME ON THE PROPERTY
WOULD IT SOLVE THE PROBLEM AND THE CASE
COULD BE CLOSED.

LINDA CONRAD STATED MR. BALDRIDGE WOULD
STILL NOT BE PERMITTED TO RUN A
BUSINESS
OR A COMMERCIAL OPERATION ON THE
PROPERTY EVEN IF A MOBILE HOME WERE TO
BE PLACED ON THE PROPERTY BECAUSE IT IS
ZONED FOR A SINGLE FAMILY HOME AND NOT
A
BUSINESS AND THEIR CLIENT WOULD HAVE TO
FOLLOW THE CODE OF ORDINANCES.

BUD FURR REQUESTED A 60 DAY EXTENSION.

BEVERLY SINGLEY STATED THE SPECIAL
MAGISTRATE WOULD HAVE TO GRANT THE
CONTINUANCE.

APRIL HARTSEIL ASKED BUD FURR IF THEY
WERE GOING TO SUBMIT A LETTER
CONTESTING
THE VIOLATION.

NANCYE CORNELIUS WANTED TO KNOW WHY A
CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER DID NOT COME
OUT TO THE PROPERTY FROM MARCH 23, 2009
TO JANUARY 8, 2010.

LINDA CONRAD STATED THIS CASE HAS BEEN
OPEN SINCE FEBRUARY 3, 2009 AND, DUE TO
MANY OPEN CASES AND STAFFING, HEALTH
AND
SAFETY CASES ARE ADDRESSED FIRST.

BEVERLY SINGLEY STATED THE CODE
ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS TRY TO GO BACK TO
PROPERTIES LOCATED IN A SUBDIVISION AT
A
TIME AND THE CASES COME UP ON ROSTER FOR
REINSPECTION.

EDWARD BALDRIDGE, NANCYE CORNELIUS, AND
BUD FURR LEFT THE ROOM FOR A SHORT
BREAK
AND RETURNED SHORTLY THEREAFTER.

NANCYE CORNELIUS STATED THEY WERE STILL
SUBMITTING THE LETTER CONTESTING.

BEVERLY SINGLEY STATED THEY WOULD HAVE
TO PAY A $50 FEE TO APPEAR BEFORE THE
SPECIAL MAGISTRATE TO CONTEST THE
CITATION AND ALSO SUBMIT A LIST OF
WITNESSES THAT WOULD APPEAR IF THEY HAD
ANY AND A NOTICE TO APPEAR FOR THE
ATTORNEY.

BUD FURR STATED HE FELT IT WAS
UNCONSTITUTIONAL THERE WAS A $50 FEE TO
CONTEST THE CITATION AND TO APPEAR
BEFORE THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE AND DID
NOT WANT TO PAY IT.

BEVERLY SINGLEY STATED THE $50 FEE
WOULD
HAVE TO ARRIVE BY 5:00 P.M. TODAY IN
ORDER TO CONTEST THIS CITATION.

BUD FURR STATED HE WAS NOT SURE IF THEY
WOULD PAY THE FEE OR NOT AND ASKED TO
APPEAR BEFORE THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE
WITHOUT PAYING THE FEE.

LINDA CONRAD STATED THE B.C.C. ADOPTED
THE ORDINANCE AND CODE ENFORCEMENT
ENFORCES THE CODE, AND IF THE $50 FEE
IS
NOT PAID BY 5:00 P.M. TODAY, THEY WOULD
NOT BE ABLE TO CONTEST THE CITATION.

APRIL HARTSEIL REQUESTED THEY TAKE THE
LETTER TO CONTEST BACK SINCE THERE WAS
NO FEE SUBMITTED.

BUD FURR ASKED THAT THEIR LETTER
CONTESTING BE PUT IN THE FILE BUT
STATED
HE WAS NOT SURE IF THEY WERE GOING TO
PAY THE $50 FEE OR IF THEY WERE GOING
TO
RETURN BY 5:00 P.M. TODAY.

THE FEE WAS NOT SUBMITTED BY 5:00 P.M.
AND NO NOTICE OF HEARING WAS GIVEN.
1 HR
01-12-201004:04 PMUPDATE/NOTES1-12-2010 NANCYE CORNELIUS, ATTORNEY
FOR
MR. BALDRIDGE CALLED, 453-3430 TO SET
UP
A MEETING. SCHEDULED WITH APRIL, LINDA,
NANCY THE ATTORNEY AND MYSELF FOR
JANUARY 25, 2010 AT 1:00PM. BEV
15 MINS.
01-08-201004:11 PMOFFICIAL FORMA.O.P.-BS PRINTED BY BSINGLEY
01-08-201004:11 PMOFFICIAL FORMAFFIDAVITOFP PRINTED BY BSINGLEY
01-08-201011:35 AMREINSPECTION1-8-2010 POSTED CITATION #5443 FOR 5-17
FOR LAWN MOWER, PARTS, ACCUMULATION OF
SALVAGE. GAVE UNTIL 1-25-2010 TO
CORRECT
AND CONTEST AND 2-5-2010 TO PAY. BEV,
AH
AND GA
45 MINS.
03-30-200901:03 PMUPDATE/NOTES3-30-09 RECEIVED A REQUEST FOR 30 DAYS
FROM MR. BALDRIDGE ASKING FOR AN
EXTENSION FOR CLEAN UP, GRANTED THE
EXTENSION UNTIL 4-30-09. RECEIVED IT
ON
MARCH 30, 2009. BEV
15 MINS.
03-23-200902:43 PMUPDATE/NOTES03-23-09 AT 1:00 MEET WITH ED BALDRIDGE
THE SON / HE IS TRYING TO APPLY FOR AN
EXTENSION ON TIME TO COMPLY THE SALVAGE
COMPANY CAN ONLY DROP A DUMPSTER EVERY
TWO WEEKS AND IT WILL TAKE LONGER THAN
GIVEN TIME / I GAVE THE AN EXAMPLE OF
THE INFORAMTION I WOULD LOOK FOR ON A
WRITTEN REQUEST FOR THE EXTENSION / I
ALSO GAVE THEM A PERMIT APPLICATION TO
APPLY FOR A FENCE PERMIT AND WE TALKED
ABOUT THE STRUCTURE THAT IS ON THE
PROPERTY IS NON CONFORMING STRUCTURE
BUT
IS BUILT PRIOR TO ZONING CODE / THE
STRUCTURE WILL BE ALLOWED TO STAY BUT
COULD NOT RUN A BUSINESS OUT OF THE
STRUCTURE ALSO GAVE HIM A COPY OF THE
M1-S ZONING CODE FOR PERMITTED
PRINCIPAL
USES / HE COULD WITH ENG DRAWINGS
PERMIT
IT TO CHANGE TO A HOME / MR BALDRIDGE
SUBMITTED A PUBLIC RECORDS REQUEST BUT
CAME BACK AND ASKED US TO DISREGARD /
HE
WROTE THAT ON THE PUBLIC RECORDS
REQUEST
AND THAT CAN BE FOUND IN THE FILE PER
LINDA /AH & LC
30 MINS.
03-02-200907:33 AMINITIAL INSPECTION3-2-09 OWNER, MR. BALDRIDGE REFUSED TO
SIGN THE WARNING CITATION #4028. HE
WAS
HANDED THE COPY FOR HIM, BUT WOULDN'T
SIGN, APRIL WAS A WITNESS AT THE
PROPERTY. WARNING CIT. WAS GIVEN FOR
5-17 AND 12.08.109. ACCUMULATION OF
DEBRIS, TIRES, METALS, LOTS OF LAWN
MOWERS, PARTS AND RECYCLING BUSINESS
WITH ALUM. CANS. 12.08.109, RUNNING
HOME OCCUPATION FROM YARD AND ACCESSORY
BUILDING. GAVE UNTIL 3-29-09 TO
CORRECT. MR. BALDRIDGE WAS UPSET THAT
CE
WAS THERE AGAIN, SAYS HE HAS BEEN
VISITED FOR SEVERAL YEARS AND THOUGHT
THIS WAS SOLVED YEARS AGO, HE FEELS HE
IS GRANDFATHERED IN. SAYS THE PROPERTY
WAS A SEPTIC BUSINESS, A CAR LOT AND
NOW
RECYCLING AND LAWN MOWER BUSINESS. HE
WAS ALSO GIVEN W. CIT. BY APRIL FOR
PROPERTY ACROSS THE STREET AT 1217, HE
HAS EXPLANDED THE SCRAPPING MATERIAL
ACROSS THE STREET. HE SAID HE WOULD
COME
AND TALK TO LINDA CONRAD. BEV
45 MINS.
02-03-200911:45 AMCREATE COMPLAINTCOMPLAINT RECORDED BY AHARTSEI
Copyright © 2008 – THE PLUS SERIES ® – All Rights Reserved