-     My Account  
   

Log in is not required to search. In the red banner above select: I Want To > Search > Permits

Code Enforcement Detail
Code Enforcement Detail
Case Number CE08100020 complainant  
Case Date 10-03-2008 address  
Origination PHONE - TELEPHONE CALL RECEIVED Status L - LIEN CREATED
Operator djones Officer NORTH
Fines Balance $20,663.77
Lien Balance $7,600.50
Total Balance $28,264.27
Property On Case
STRAP NBR C-27-33-28-150-0000-0770 Owner RAMSAY SHERMANDA ANDERSON
Unit   Owner Address 275 CARRIANN COVE CT
Property Address 212 GARRETT RD City/State/Zip JACKSONVILLE FL 32225
City/State/Zip AVON PARK FL 33825 Phone  
Case Description
CALLER STATES THE ABANDON BUILDING NEXT TO HER
BUSINESS THAT IS AN EYESORE AND APPEARS TO BE
UNSAFE
Violation Code(s)
1: INT -- INTEREST ON LIEN
2: SM FINE/LIEN -- SPEC MAGISTRATE DAILY FINE
Inspections/Events Detail
DATETIMEINSPECTION / EVENT TYPEINSTRUCTIONS / COMMENTS
04-05-201204:27 PMUPDATE/NOTESFINE CHANGED INT
START DATE: 08/28/09 FINE AMT: 3.75
CHANGED DATE THAT INTEREST STARTS TO
ACCRUE TO THE DAY OF RECORDING OF THE
ORDER. TED
05-11-201004:42 PMUPDATE/NOTESCHANGED DATE OF LIEN TO 8/29/09 (DAY
AFTER RECORDING OF AMENDED LIEN) AND
INTEREST RATE TO 18% PER ANNUM ACCRUING
FROM 8/29/09. TED
05-11-201004:39 PMUPDATE/NOTESFINE CHANGED INT
START DATE: 08/29/09 FINE AMT: 3.75
12-30-200912:49 PMREINSPECTION12-30-09 LIEN IS PLACED BY THE
MAGISTRATE/ NO NEED FOR ANY FURTHER
INSPECTION ON THIS CASE /AH
12-23-200909:20 AMUPDATE/NOTESRELEASE NON PER OR 2219 PG 399 ON
12/14/2009. TED
10-14-200903:03 PMUPDATE/NOTESADDED FINE ON 5.6-2(4)
START DATE: FINE AMT:
10-14-200903:02 PMREINSPECTION10-14-09 AFFIDAVIT OF COMPLIANCE DONE,
CONTRACTOR- JOHNSON'S EXCAVATION HAS
REMOVED THE STRUCTURE. WILL NEED TO
RELEASE THE NOTICE OF NUISANCE. NEED TO
PAY INVOICE WHEN RECIEVED. BEV
10-07-200912:38 PMREINSPECTION10-7-09 JOHNSON'S EXCAVATION WAS ON SITE
REMOVING THE STRUCTURE. WILL CHECK AGAIN
FOR COMPLIANCE PHOTO. BEV
09-24-200901:23 PMUPDATE/NOTES9-24-09 S.Y., I AND CLYDE HAVE VERIFIED
THERE IS NO POWER RUNNING INTO THIS
STRUCTURE AT ALL. METER BOX THERE BUT NO
METER WORKING, NO LINE INTO STRUCTURE.
CALLED JOHNSON'S EXCAVATION AND GAVE
OKAY TO START DEMOLITION. SPOKE TO CAROL
AT JOHNSON'S. SHE WILL CALL WITH A DATE
WHEN DEMO WILL TAKE PLACE, BEV
09-22-200908:11 AMUPDATE/NOTESADDED FINE ON INT
START DATE: 08/28/09 FINE AMT: 2.08
09-22-200908:11 AMUPDATE/NOTESLIEN RECORDED 08/28/09 FOR 7,600.50
BOOK PAGE
09-21-200910:18 AMUPDATE/NOTES9-21-09 FAXED THE PURCHASE ORDER TO
JOHNSON'S EXCAVATION TODAY, ASKED THEM
TO CALL ME AND TELL WHICH DAY THEY WILL
BE GOING TO THE SITE. BEV
08-13-200910:15 AMCOURT APPEARANCETHE RESPONDENT WAS NOT IN ATTENDANCE AT
THE HEARING. THE PETITIONER, HIGHLANDS
COUNTY, WAS REPRESENTED BY CODE
ENFORCEMENT OFFICER BEVERLY SINGLEY WHO
TESTIFIED THAT THIS CASE WAS ORIGINALLY
HEARD ON MARCH 12, 2009. THE RESPONDENT
REQUESTED A REHEARING BEFORE THE SPECIAL
MAGISTRATE; A REHEARING WAS GRANTED AND
THE CASE WAS REHEARD ON JUNE 11, 2009.
MS. SINGLEY WENT ON TO TESTIFY THAT THE
RESPONDENT CHOSE TO FOLLOW THE OPTION
DESCRIBED IN PARAGRAPH 10B OF THE
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW,
AND ORDER ISSUED ON JUNE 22, 2009. THE
RESPONDENT WAS TO PULL A DEMOLITION
PERMIT, AND COMPLETE DEMOLITION BY JULY
31, 2009. MS. SINGLEY TESTIFIED THAT SHE
RECEIVED INFORMATION FROM THE HIGHLANDS
COUNTY BUILDING DEPARTMENT THAT THE
RESPONDENT HIRED A CONTRACTOR, A
DEMOLITION PERMIT WAS ISSUED TO THE
CONTRACTOR, HOWEVER THE CONTRACTOR
REVOKED THE PERMIT AND THE DEMOLITION
WAS NOT COMPLETED. MS. SINGLEY TESTIFIED
THAT THE VIOLATION CONTINUED BEYOND THE
DATE SPECIFIED FOR CORRECTION, AND WAS
NOT IN COMPLIANCE AS OF THE DATE OF THE
HEARING. THE PETITIONER REQUESTED TO BE
REIMBURSED FOR COSTS AND FEES ASSOCIATED
WITH THIS PENALTY HEARING, ALONG WITH
COSTS PREVIOUSLY IMPOSED BY THE SPECIAL
MAGISTRATE. THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FOUND
THAT THE RESPONDENT DID NOT COMPLY WITH
THE FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF
LAW, AND ORDER ISSUED ON JUNE 22, 2009.
THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE ADMITTED ALL
EXHIBITS INTO EVIDENCE. THE SPECIAL
MAGISTRATE ORDERED THE RESPONDENT TO PAY
TO THE PETITIONER A FINE IN THE AMOUNT
OF $3,750.00, $150.00 COST OF A TITLE
SEARCH, $250.00 COST OF INVESTIGATION,
$375.00 ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING FEE,
$85.50 RECORDING FEE, $2,990.00 COST OF
BRINGING THE PROPERTY INTO COMPLIANCE
FOR A TOTAL OF $7,600.50.
08-12-200910:05 AMCHECK FOR COMPLIANCE8-12-09 NO COMPLIANCE, AFFIDAVIT DONE,
BEV
30 MINS.
07-31-200907:57 AMREINSPECTION07-31-09 POSTED AGENDA ON PROPERTY AT
8:00 AM /STILL NOT IN COMPLIANCE /30
MINS /BEV & AH
07-07-200909:53 AMREINSPECTION7-7-09 DEMO PERMIT PULLED, PERMIT NUMBER
09070060, BEV
07-07-200909:49 AMUPDATE/NOTES7-7-09 SCOTT & OLIVIA HOOVER,
863-638-7940, PULLED THE
PERMIT FOR DEMOLITION FOR THE
STRUCTURE.
HE WAS HIRED BY THE OWNER. HE WAS READ
THE ORDER GIVEN BY THE SPECIAL
MAGISTRATE AND WAS TOLD THE DEADLINE
DATE TO HAVE COMPLETED WAS BY JULY 30,
2009. HE THINKS HE CAN GET IT DONE BY
THEN. HE IS GOING TO CALL CE WHEN HE
SCHEDULES THE JOB. GAVE HIM A BUSINESS
CARD. BEV
07-06-200912:42 PMUPDATE/NOTES07-06-09 AT 12:20 PM RECIEVED A CALL
FROM A CONTRACTOR SCOTT HOOVER FROM POL
COUNTY AND HE WAS INQUIRING ABOUT HOW
MUCH TIME THAT HE HAD TO COMPLETE THE
JOB THE OWNER IS TRYING TO HIRE HIM BUT
HE CLAIMS SHE DOES NOT HAVE THE MONEY TO
PAY THE ENTIRE AMOUNT AND IS TRYING TO
NEGOTIATE A LOWER PRICE /AH
06-11-200904:22 PMCOURT APPEARANCETHE RESPONDENT WAS IN ATTENDANCE AT THE
HEARING, THE PETITIONER, HIGHLANDS
COUNTY, WAS REPRESENTED BY CODE
ENFORCEMENT OFFICER BEVERLY SINGLEY.
THIS CASE WAS ORIGINALLY HEARD ON MARCH
12, 2009. FOLLOWING THE HEARING THE
RESPONDENT SUBMITTED A LETTER FROM AN
ENGINEER WHO HAD A DIFFERING OPINION IN
REGARDS TO WHETHER OR NOT THE STRUCTURE
COULD BE RENOVATED AND REQUESTED A
REHEARING BEFORE THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE.
THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE GRANTED THIS
REHEARING ON THE GROUNDS THAT THE
DECISION WAS CONTRARY TO THE EVIDENCE.
WITNESS FOR THE PETITIONER, HIGHLANDS
COUNTY BUILDING OFFICIAL, SOL Y. MOSELEY
TESTIFIED THAT HE MET WITH THE
RESPONDENT, THE ENGINEER, AND CODE
ENFORCEMENT, AND STILL BELIEVES THAT THE
STRUCTURE, IN ITS CURRENT CONDITION, IS
NOT STRUCTURALLY SOUND. CODE
ENFORCEMENT OFFICER, BEVERLY SINGLEY,
TESTIFIED THAT ACCORDING TO THE FLORIDA
BUILDING CODE, CHAPTER 4 SECTION 405.1,
THE COST OF THE REMODEL CAN NOT EXCEED
MORE THAN 50% OF THE $25,880.00 ASSESSED
VALUE OF THE STRUCTURE, SO THE COST OF
THE REMODEL CAN NOT EXCEED $12,940.00.
THE PETITIONER REQUESTED THAT IT BE
REIMBURSED FOR FINES, FEES AND COSTS
ASSOCIATED WITH THIS CASE. THE
RESPONDENT TESTIFIED THAT SHE HAS AN
ARCHITECT READY TO PREPARE PLANS FOR THE
RENOVATION, AND HAS INDIVIDUALS WITH
CONSTRUCTION EXPERIENCE COMMITTED TO
ASSIST WITH CONSTRUCTION LABOR, SO THE
RESPONDENT WILL ONLY NEED TO PURCHASE
MATERIALS. THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FOUND
THAT A VIOLATION EXISTED, AND THE
VIOLATION CONTINUES TO EXIST. THE
SPECIAL MAGISTRATE ADMITTED ALL EXHIBITS
INTO EVIDENCE. THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE
REVERSED HER PRIOR ORDER, AND GAVE THE
RESPONDENT THE OPTION TO EITHER
REMODEL/REPAIR OR TO DEMOLISH THE
STRUCTURE. IF THE RESPONDENT CHOOSES TO
REMODEL/REPAIR THE STRUCTURE, THE
RESPONDENT MUST SUBMIT AN ENGINEERED
DRAWING TO THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT AND
OBTAIN A PERMIT ON OR BEFORE JULY 9,
2009, COMMENCE RE-CONSTRUCTION ON OR
BEFORE JULY 30, 2009, AND COMPLETE
RE-CONSTRUCTION ON OR BEFORE FEBRUARY 1,
2010. IF THIS OPTION IS SELECTED THE
RESPONDENT SHALL PAY TO PETITIONER A
REDUCED FINE OF $1,595.00, $250.00
ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING FEE, $150.00 COST
OF TITLE SEARCH, $200.00 COST OF
INVESTIGATION, $157.50 COST OF
PROSECUTION, AND $57.00 RECORDING FEE
FOR A TOTAL OF $2,606.94. IF THE
RESPONDENT CHOOSES TO DEMOLISH THE
STRUCTURE, A DEMOLITION PERMIT MUST BE
OBTAINED AND DEMOLITION COMPLETED ON OR
BEFORE JULY 30, 2009. IF THIS OPTION IS
SELECTED THE RESPONDENT SHALL PAY TO
PETITIONER A REDUCED FINE OF $1,595.00,
$250.00 ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING FEE,
$150.00 COST OF TITLE SEARCH, $200.00
COST OF INVESTIGATION, $157.50 COST OF
PROSECUTION, AND $57.00 RECORDING FEE
FOR A TOTAL OF $2,606.94. IF THE
RESPONDENT PROCEEDS WITH THE OPTION TO
REPAIR/REMODEL AND FAILS TO OBTAIN A
PERMIT ON OR BEFORE JULY 9, 2009, OR
FAILS TO COMMENCE RE-CONSTRUCTION ON OR
BEFORE JULY 30, 2009, THIS CASE WILL BE
BROUGHT TO PENALTY HEARING ON AUGUST 13,
2009, FOR IMPOSITION OF A CONTINUING
DAILY FINE OF $50.00 PER DAY COMMENCING
ON JULY 9, 2009, THE ORIGINAL FINE IN
THE AMOUNT OF $3,050.00 AND COST OF
DEMOLITION OF $2,990.00, WITH
INSTRUCTION FOR PETITIONER TO DEMOLISH
THE STRUCTURE. IF THE RESPONDENT CHOOSES
TO REPAIR/REMODEL AND FAILS TO COMPLETE
CONSTRUCTION ON OR BEFORE FEBRUARY 1,
2010, THIS CASE WILL BE BROUGHT TO
PENALTY HEARING ON FEBRUARY 11, 2010,
FOR IMPOSITION OF A CONTINUING DAILY
FINE OF $100.00 PER DAY FROM FEBRUARY 1,
2010 UNTIL THE ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE
OF OCCUPANCY BY THE HIGHLANDS COUNTY
BUILDING DEPARTMENT AND THE ORIGINAL
FINE AMOUNT OF $3,050.00. IF THE
RESPONDENT CHOOSES THE OPTION OF
DEMOLITION AND FAILS TO COMPLETE THE
DEMOLITION ON OR BEFORE JULY 30, 2009,
THIS CASE WILL BE BROUGHT TO PENALTY
HEARING ON AUGUST 13, 2009, FOR
IMPOSITION OF A CONTINUING DAILY FINE OF
$50.00 PER DAY FROM JULY 30, 2009, THE
ORIGINAL FINE OF $3,050.00, AND THE COST
OF DEMOLITION IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,990.00
WITH INSTRUCTION FOR PETITIONER TO
DEMOLISH THE STRUCTURE.
06-10-200909:48 AMUPDATE/NOTES6-10-09 REVIEW FILE, PREPARED SPEECH FOR
SM HEARING, BEV
60 MINS.
06-08-200909:31 AMUPDATE/NOTES6-8-09 MAILED WITNESS LIST TO OWNER FOR
SM HEARING ON JUNE 11, 2009. BEV
30 MINS.
06-04-200908:19 AMUPDATE/NOTES6-4-09 VERIFIED WITH JOHNSON'S
EXCAVATION FOR BID THAT WAS GIVEN, WOULD
IT STILL BE GOOD UNTIL SEPT. THEY SAID
YES, PURCHASE ORDER STILL GOOD, BEV
05-29-200909:47 AMREINSPECTION5-29-09 POSTED SM PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA
FOR JUNE 11, 2009 HEARING ON PROPERTY.
STRUCTURE STILL THERE, LOTS OF TRASH IN
THERE AND ALL AROUND THE STRUCTURE.
AFFIDAVIT FOR POSTING DONE, BEV
30 MINS.
05-26-200912:48 PMUPDATE/NOTES5-26-09 CALLED JOHNSON'S EXCAVATION,
813-752-7097 AND SPOKE TO CAROL.
CONFIRMING AGAIN THAT THYE CAN NOT DO
THE DEMOLITION AS OF NOW, GOING BACK TO
SPECIAL MAG. IN JUNE. SHE MADE ANOTHER
NOTE ON HER FILE, BEV
05-20-200912:49 PMUPDATE/NOTES5-20-09 JOE SENT OWNER A NOTICE OF
HEARING, CERTIFIED AND REGULAR MAIL. BEV
04-13-200903:22 PMUPDATE/NOTES4-13-09 MET WITH MS. RAMSEY, CARL COOL,
ENGINEER, AND S.Y. MOSELY, REGARDING
THE
PROPERTY. CARL SUBMITTED A LETTER
STATING THAT THE STRUCTURE WALLS COULD
BE REPAIRED BUT THE WOOD AND ROOF LINE
WOULD NEED TO BE REPLACED. S.Y. AGREED
AND LETTER WAS SUBMITTED IN THE FILE.
MS. RAMSEY WAS GIVEN A COPY OF THE
CITATION ORDINANCE WITH SECTION
REGARDING FILING FOR REHEARING. SHE
WAS
TOLD THE DEADLINE WOULD BE APRIL 15TH
BUT SINCE APRIL 10TH WAS A HOLIDAY,
THAT
APRIL 16TH WOULD BE THE DEADLINE. BE30
MINS.
04-13-200909:19 AMUPDATE/NOTES4-13-09 MS. RAMSEY SUBMITTED A WRITTEN
REQUEST FOR REHEARING ON THIS PROPERTY
WITH COPY OF CARL COOL'S LETTER. WILL
FORWARD THIS TO THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE,
PAM KARLSON TO SEE IF SHE WOULD ALLOW
THE REHEARING. BEV
04-08-200903:41 PMUPDATE/NOTES4-8-09 RECEIVED CALL FROM CARL COOL. HE
HAS BEEN ASKED BY OWNER, MRS. RAMSEY TO
PREPARE LETTER FOR HER TO STATE THE
STRUCTURE CAN BE SOUND AND REPAIRS CAN
BE DONE. EXPLAINED TO HIM THAT SHE ONLY
HAS UNTIL APRIL 13, 2009 AND THAT IT
NEEDS TO BE ENGINEER DRAWINGS, NOT JUST
A LETTER. HE SAID HE WOULD CALL HER
BACK. BEV
04-02-200909:05 AMUPDATE/NOTES04-02-09 AT 9:12 AM MRS RAMSEY CALLED
BACK AND THOUGHT THAT THE ENGINEERING
HAD SUBMITTED SOMETHING TO US / I
EXPLAINED THAT THE REQUEST FOR REHEARING
SHALL COME FROM HER AND MUST BE BASED ON
THE FACTS THAT THE STRUCTURE CAN BE
REPAIRED OR ANYTHING THAT WOULD BE
DIFFERENT FROM THE FACTS GIVEN AT THE
HEARING /BASICALLY IT IS THAT SHE IS
WILLING TO STEP UP AND TAKE THE
NECESSARY ACTION TO SAVE THE STRUCTURE
/I ALSO EXPLAINED THAT SHE IS ON A
DEADLINE AND THAT WE CAN NOT
DIFFERENTIATE FROM THE DEADLINE AS
LISTED IN THE CODE AS FIFTEEN DAYS SINCE
THAT FIFTEEN DAYS LANDS ON A HOLIDAY WE
MUST GIVE TO THE NEXT BUSINESS DAY/ SHE
MUST SUBMIT BY APRIL 13, 2009 /AH
04-02-200908:52 AMUPDATE/NOTES04-02-09 AT 5:58 AM CALLED MRS RAMSEY
AND LEFT MESSAGE FOR HER / IF SHE IS
REQUESTING A REHEARING SHE HAS UNTIL
APRIL 13, 2009 TO SUBMIT THE PAPERWORK
FOR THE REHEARING /AH
03-31-200909:36 AMREINSPECTION3-31-09 STRUCTURE STILL THERE, BEV
03-19-200910:06 AMUPDATE/NOTES3-19-09 SPOKE TO MS. RAMSEY,
904-534-9451. SHE HAS HIRED AN ENGINEER,
AND HE IS TO HAVE THE DRAWINGS DONE BY
MARCH 23RD SHE HOPED. SHE DID GET TO
SPEAK WITH S.Y. AND A COUSIN WHO
UNDERSTANDS THE JUST OF WHAT NEEDS TO BE
DONE. BEV
03-17-200902:15 PMUPDATE/NOTES03-17-09 SPOKE TO A REGGIE COX
561-819-5541 WHO SAID HE WAS RELATED TO
MRS RAMSEY AND HE IS A BUILDING
INSPECTOR/OFFICIAL FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY
HE WAS UNAWARE THAT THE BUILDING WAS IN
SUCH BAD SHAPE BUT HAS REFERRED MRS
RAMSEY TO A ARCHITECT IN HIGHLANDS
COUNTY /AH
03-16-200903:28 PMUPDATE/NOTES3-16-09 SPOKE TO MRS. RAMSEY, EXPLAINED
TO HER THAT I HAD SPOKEN TO S.Y. MOSELY
THE BUILDING OFFICIAL AND HE STATED THAT
SHE NEEDS THE ENGINEER DRAWINGS TO
DETERMINE THAT THE STRUCTURE CAN BE
SAVED NOT JUST THE LETTER. SHE FELT LIKE
SHE WANTED HER FRIEND TO SPEAK WITH S.Y.
SO THAT SHE UNDERSTOOD FULLY. SHE WAS
GOING TO CALL S.Y. BACK TODAY. REMINDED
HER ABOUT THE 15 DAY DEADLINE FOR
REHEARING AND SHE DOES REALIZE THE TIME
FRAME, BEV
03-16-200910:49 AMUPDATE/NOTES03-16-09 AT 10:56 AM SPOKE TO MRS RAMSEY
AND SHE HAS CALLED SEVERAL ENGINEERS AND
ONLY ONE HAS CALLED HER BACK / THE
ENGINEER IS FIQURING A PRICE FOR HER TO
GO OUT TO THE HOUSE AND CHECK IT / SHE
WILL CALL BACK AS SOON AS SHE HAS MORE
INFORMATION /AH
03-13-200912:13 PMUPDATE/NOTES03-13-09 THE OWNER SHERMANDA
904-534-9451 CALLED AND SHE WAS ON HER
WAY TO THE HEARING AND REALIZED THE
HEARING WAS YESTERDAY /AH
03-13-200909:27 AMUPDATE/NOTES03-13-09 MEET WITH MRS RAMSEY AND
EXPLAINED HER OPTIONS OF REQUESTING
REHEARING AND THAT SHE WOULD NEED
ENGINEERED DRAWINGS TO BE ABLE TO
CONTEST ON A FACTUAL BASIS THAT WE
SHOULD NOT CONDEMN STRUCTURE / ALSO
EXPLAINED THAT SHE COULD APPEAL TO THE
CIRCUIT COURT / GAVE HER A COPY OF
EVIDENTIARY AND EXPLAINED SY'S REPORT /
SHE WAS LEAVING OUR OFFICE TO GO AND
LOOK AT THE STRUCTURE AGAIN WITH
SOMEONE
SHE HAD BROUGHT TO HELP HER REMOD THAT
STRUCTURE / SHE WILL LET US KNOW ON
MONDAY ON HOW SHE WOULD LIKE TO PROCEED
/ALSO BEVERLY CALLED JOHNSON'S AND
ASKED
THEM TO HOLD OFF UNTIL WE CALL BACK /
IF
SHE SUBMITS THE REQUEST FOR REHEARING
SHE WOULD GET A STAY OF THE ORDER UNTIL
PAM MAKES A FINAL DECISION/ MRS RAMSEY
WAS VERY LOGICAL AND WILL TAKE ALL THE
OPTIONS AND DECIDE BY MONDAY /BEV & AH
30 MINS
03-12-200909:29 AMMAKE VIOLATIONMAKEVIO RECORDED AHARTSEI
03-12-200908:18 AMCOURT APPEARANCETHE RESPONDENT WAS NOT IN ATTENDANCE AT
THE HEARING, THE PETITIONER, HIGHLANDS
COUNTY, WAS REPRESENTED BY CODE
ENFORCEMENT OFFICER BEVERLY SINGLEY.
HIGHLANDS COUNTY BUILDING OFFICIAL S.Y.
MOSELEY TESTIFIED THAT IN ITS CURRENT
CONDITION THE BUILDING IS BEYOND REPAIR.
IT IS THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE BUILDING
OFFICIAL THAT THE STRUCTURE BE
DEMOLISHED IMMEDIATELY, AND ALL
ASSOCIATED DEBRIS REMOVED FROM THE
PROPERTY. CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER,
BEVERLY SINGLEY, TESTIFIED THAT A
VIOLATION OF SECTION 5.6-3 (NUISANCE
STRUCTURE) WAS OBSERVED ON THE PROPERTY.
A NOTICE OF VIOLATION #00283 WAS ISSUED,
AND THE RESPONDENT WAS GIVEN A
REASONABLE PERIOD OF TIME TO CORRECT THE
VIOLATION. THE VIOLATION CONTINUED
BEYOND THE DATE SPECIFIED FOR
CORRECTION, AND THE VIOLATION HAD NOT
BEEN CORRECTED AS OF THE DATE OF THE
HEARING. THE CASE WAS SCHEDULED FOR A
PUBLIC HEARING, THE RESPONDENT AND ALL
INTERESTED PARTIES WERE PROPERLY
NOTIFIED OF THE HEARING. THE PETITIONER
REQUESTS THAT A LIEN BE IMPOSED ON THE
PROPERTY IN THE AMOUNT OF $6,640.69. THE
SPECIAL MAGISTRATE ORDERED THAT THE
RESPONDENT SHALL PAY TO THE PETITIONER
$150.00 FOR THE COST OF A TITLE SEARCH,
$100.00 COST OF INVESTIGATION, $197.19
COST OF PROSECUTION, $125.00
ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING FEE, $28.50
RECORDING FEE, $2,990.00 COST OF
CORRECTING THE VIOLATION, A DAILY FINE
OF $50.00 PER DAY FOR A PERIOD OF 61
DAYS IN THE AMOUNT OF $3,050.00 FOR A
TOTAL OF $6,640.69.
03-11-200908:05 AMREINSPECTION3-11-09 NO COMPLIANCE, STRUCTURE STILL
THERE, AFFIDAVIT OF NON COMPLIANCE DONE,
PHOTOS, BEV
30 MINS.
02-27-200901:33 PMREINSPECTION2-27-09 POSTED SPECIAL MAGISTRATE AGENDA
ON PROPERTY FOR MARCH 12, 2009 PUBLIC
HEARING, TOOK PHOTOS. NO COMPLIANCE.
BEV
30 MINS.
02-20-200908:21 AMUPDATE/NOTES2-20-09 RECEIVED BIDS BACK AND JOHNSON
EXCAVATION HAS WON THE BID TO REMOVE
STRUCTURE. BEV
02-17-200908:20 AMREINSPECTION2-17-09 NO COMPLIANCE, TOOK PHOTOS,
CHECK LOT LINES FOR CONTRACTORS FOR BID
TO DEMO. FOUND THAT THE LOT LINE IN
REAR ENDS RIGHT BEFORE THE OLD TRUCK,
THE SECOND FOUNDATION AND HALF BLOCK
WALL OF BUILDING IS NOT ON THIS
PROPERTY. BEV & AH
45 MINS.
02-03-200909:34 AMUPDATE/NOTES2-3-09 JOE SENT OUT TO PURCHASING TO BID
FOR DEMO. BEV HAND DELIVERED AND STAMPED
IN AT PURCHASING. BEV
01-15-200903:54 PMREINSPECTION1-15-09 NO COMPLIANCE, STRUCTURE STILL
THERE, ASKING JOE TO PUT OUT TO BID FOR
DEMO, NON, NOH, AND TITLE SEARCH, FOR
MARCH HEARING, BEV
30 MINS.
01-07-200902:48 PMUPDATE/NOTES01-07-09 A FRIEND OF THE OWNERS CALLED
AND WANTED US TO HOLD OFF FOR A COUPLE
OF MONTHS FOR THEM TO MAKE THE REPAIRS
/
I READ SY'S REPORT TO HIM AND EXPLAINED
THAT THE STRUCUTRE DAMAGE WOULD BE VERY
COSTLY AND COULD POSSIBLY COST MORE THAN
REBUILDING / WE COULD GIVE AN EXTENSION
OF ONLY TEN OR TWENTY DAYS IF THE OWNER
CAME IN AND REQUESTED BUT HE WOULD HAVE
TO SHOW ENGINEERED DRAWINGS TO DO SO
/HIS NAME WAS ALAN AND HE THANK ME FOR
THE INFORMATION AND DECIDED AGIANST IT
AT THIS TIME /AH
15 MINS.
12-12-200801:22 PMUPDATE/NOTES12-12-08 MAILED LETTER TO OWNER, COPY OF
NOTICE OF VIOLATION AND SHC REPORT FROM
S.Y. BEV
45 MINS.
12-09-200808:30 AMINITIAL INSPECTION12-9-08 POSTED NOTICE OF VIOLATION #283
FOR 5.6-3 UNSAFE STRUCTURE. GAVE UNTIL
1-9-09 TO CORRECT AND THE SM PUBLIC
HEARING 3-12-09. S.Y. MOSELY, BUILDING
OFFICIAL HAS DONE REPORT AND HAS
RECOMMENDED REMOVAL OF THE PROPERTY. BEV
& CLYDE
45 MINS.
10-06-200808:30 AMSTANDARD HOUSING CODETHIS STRUCTURE IS AN OLD CONCRETE BLOCK
BUILDING WITH 3X6 WOOD BEAMS AND AN
OPEN
DECK CEILING. THE 1X6 DECKING HAS
ROTTED AWAY IN MANY PLACES AND THERE
ARE
SEVERAL LARGE HOLES IN THE ROOF. THE
BEAMS HAVE BEGAN TO ROT AT THE ROOF
EDGE
AND AT THE OPENINGS. THE INTERIOR
WALLS
HAVE BEEN KNOCKED DOWN OR HAVE ROTTED
DUE TO EXPOSURE TO RAIN. ALL THE GLASS
HAS BEEN KNOCKED OUT OF THE FRAMES AND
ALL EXTERIOR DOORS ARE MISSING. THERE
ARE SEVERAL CRACKS IN THE WALLS ALSO.
DUE TO THE HAZARD TO THE PUBLIC CAUSED
BY THE UNSAFE STRUCTURE, I RECOMMEND
REMOVAL FROM THE SITE.
60 MINS.
10-03-200808:31 AMUPDATE/NOTES10-3-08 SY WILL YOU PLEASE CHECKOUT THIS
STRUCTURE AND GIVE ME A REPORT THANK YOU
BEV.
10-03-200808:25 AMCREATE COMPLAINTCOMPLAINT RECORDED BY DJONES
Copyright © 2008 – THE PLUS SERIES ® – All Rights Reserved